FX EA Tester Report
Consistency across 100 independent AI market scenarios — averaged performance, market gallery, and per-EA breakdown
Overview
One chart can flatter. 100 different futures cannot. This book stress-tests your EAs on XAUUSD across 25 bull, 25 bear, 25 range, and 25 mixed paths — then ranks what held up. Open every scenario in the 100 Market Conditions table.
The simulations are generated using deterministic rules and random seeds. AI controls market generation, while all reported statistics are calculated directly from the resulting trade data.
Why this report differs. Unlike a historical backtest, every simulation begins from a different AI-generated market path rather than replaying the same historical price movement.
Same EAs. Same deposit. Same lot size. Only the market story changes — so the rankings below show consistency, not a lucky streak.
100 Market Conditions
Leaderboard
Medal counts show how often each EA finished 1st, 2nd, or 3rd across all simulations. Ranked by gold medals, then average profit.
Simulation Data
Scale of computation behind this 100-simulation batch — every trade, bar, and ranking across all market paths.
Simulation Highlights
The strongest, most repeatable, best risk-adjusted, and highest-variability results across 100 independent market scenarios.
🏆 Overall Winner — Mosquito
Mosquito separated itself from the field by combining frequent wins with an average return of $-6.32.
Strong alignment with trending and volatile phases allowed it to stay near the front across 100 top-three finishes.
Average drawdown remained contained at 9.57%, supporting a favourable balance between profitability and capital stress.
🛡 Most Consistent — Mosquito
Profit outcomes clustered more tightly for Mosquito than for any other EA in this test.
Consistent mid-to-upper rankings reflected an ability to adapt when regimes shifted, not just excel in one market type.
It balanced repeatability with 100 outright wins — competitive without being the most aggressive in the batch.
⚖ Best Risk-Adjusted Performance — Mosquito
Profit of $-6.32 per unit of average drawdown (9.57%) ranked highest among all tested systems.
Peers with similar profits often accepted higher average drawdowns; this EA did not.
It combined the batch's highest average profit with comparatively low average drawdown, producing the strongest profit-to-drawdown trade-off.
⚠ Highest Drawdown Variability — Mosquito
No other EA matched the drawdown dispersion of Mosquito, making it the most path-dependent in this test.
Market paths that favoured other strategy types repeatedly punished this design.
When volatility aligned, it occasionally produced some of the strongest individual simulation results (best run $185.43).
Simulation Analysis by Expert Advisor
Observed across 100 independent market paths. Strategy-family context is explanatory, not a forecast.
Mosquito
Observed across 100 independent market paths: Mosquito ranked first overall with 100 simulation wins and the highest average return at $-6.32.
Strategy-family context: Responded to the market conditions present during this simulation, but hostile regime mixes outweighed favourable opportunities.
Observed risk across the sample: Peak drawdown hit 28.62% when trends ran without sufficient recovery — a defining risk characteristic of this batch.
Path variation: Finished first in 100 of 100 simulations — the most frequent winner in this batch.