MT5 gold EA · XAUUSD M5 · solo tests
CyberVest EA Download — Gold EA for XAUUSD M5
CyberVest EA is a MetaTrader 5 gold EA for XAUUSD on M5. It uses filters, news protection, and optional recovery. Six solo tests on this page run this EA alone. All six averages were minus. The $1,000 baseline lost $37.24.
What is CyberVest EA?
Version 3.20 (published 16 June 2026) is priced at 125 USD. Direction, time, and volatility filters sit in the same panel as an optional AI signal check, news protection, and spread / slippage limits. Lot scaling and adaptive recovery can add size after a loss. Daily loss, drawdown, trade-count, and open-position caps are part of the same protection set. A hedging account is required. The listed minimum deposit is 250 USD. Gold quotes should use two decimals.
These tests do not rank it against other gold EAs. Each run is this EA only, on 100 gold paths, with the deposit, risk, or window changed. The results are on this page.
- M5 chart for XAUUSD
- 0/6 settings with a plus average
- 3.20 current version
- 250 USD listed minimum
How CyberVest EA trades
Lot scaling can grow size with balance. Adaptive recovery can add size after a losing trade. You can cap daily loss, drawdown, trades per day, and how many positions stay open.
A hedging account is required. Gold should quote with two decimals (for example 2035.45). Results can differ by broker spread on M5 gold, whether recovery is on, lot size, and those caps.
What you can set
On these solo tests, 1% risk lost $37.24, 0.5% risk lost $25.65, and 2% risk lost $60.17. Lower risk lost less, but no $1,000 setting finished up on average. Keep the first live lot small. Leave recovery off until you have seen a demo. Do not raise risk to 2% hoping for a better average.
Broker presets
- XAUUSD on M5, hedging account, 2-decimal gold
- At least 250 USD as listed
- Small lot first
- Recovery off until a demo is clear
- Daily loss and drawdown caps on
Specs
- Platform
- MT5 only
- Pair
- XAUUSD on M5 only
- Price
- 125 USD
- Version
- 3.20 (published 16 June 2026)
- Filters
- Direction, time, volatility, news, spread / slippage
- Recovery
- Adaptive recovery and lot scaling in the inputs
- Quote
- XAUUSD with 2 decimals
- Account
- Hedging; listed min 250 USD; leverage 1:100+
Requirements
- MetaTrader 5, hedging account
- XAUUSD on M5 with 2-decimal quotes
- Listed minimum 250 USD
- Leverage 1:100 or higher; a small starting lot and your own loss limits
A good fit if you
- want an MT5 gold EA on XAUUSD M5 with news and spread filters
- will decide recovery on or off yourself after a demo
- will read the six solo tests first
Not a fit if you need
- need a plus average on these gold tests — all six settings were minus
- want a product with no recovery option in the inputs
Key risks and how to reduce them
What can go wrong
- All six averages were minus. The $1,000 baseline lost $37.24.
- The 2% risk test lost $60.17, with a 40.29% worst path.
- The $300 test lost $27.86, about −9.3%, with a 45.07% worst path.
- Recovery can add size after a loss. These tests are not a private funded-account set.
Safer first steps
- Run it on an XAUUSD M5 demo before any live use.
- Leave recovery off until you have seen a full demo month.
- Keep the deposit at or above the listed 250 USD.
- Do not raise risk to 2% hoping for a better average — that test lost more.
What to know before you download
- Confirm MetaTrader 5, a hedging account, and XAUUSD on M5 with 2 decimals.
- Read the six solo tests. All six averages were minus.
- Decide recovery on or off before you pay.
- Plan at least 250 USD as listed.
Solo gold tests
- Coverage: 6 tests · this EA only · 100 paths each · 90 days (one 180-day test)
- Profit: plus average on 0 of 6 tests. The $1,000 baseline was −$37.24
- Least-bad percent: $5,000 deposit, −$71.62, about −1.4%, 50 of 100 paths in profit
- 0.5% risk lost less than 1% (−$25.65 vs −$37.24). 2% risk lost $60.17
- Average drawdown about 8.5–14.7%. Worst path 45.07% on $300. No washouts
Did it make money on average?
No — it lost money on average in every test
We ran 6 gold tests of this EA alone, with different account settings. Each line is that test’s average dollar result.
Each setting is written out in the test section below.
Download CyberVest EA
These gold results are an independent XAUUSD check of the EA alone, not a live account.
How to install
- Open the official product page.
- Install it in MetaTrader 5 on an XAUUSD chart set to M5. Hedging account. Two-decimal gold.
- Set a small lot. Leave recovery off until a demo is clear.
- Turn on news protection and the daily loss / drawdown caps you want.
Listing checked 16 Oct 2026. Price can change.
Other options to compare
Compare when: you want an MT5 gold EA whose six solo averages were all plus
Goldbot One MT5 trades XAUUSD on Daily with eight breakout strategies and has a published research page.
Compare when: you want a free MT4 gold EA
Orion uses stop-based risk and can be downloaded from this site.
Test results for CyberVest EA
- 6 tests
- 100 paths each
Results breakdown
• Profit: plus average on 0 of 6 tests. Baseline −$37.24. The $5,000 test was −$71.62. The 180-day test was −$34.87.
• 0.5% risk lost less than 1% (−$25.65 vs −$37.24). 2% risk lost $60.17.
• Paths in profit: 23–50 of 100. No washouts.
• Drawdown: average max drawdown about 8.5–14.7%. Worst path 45.07% on $300, 26.35% on the baseline.
• Bottom line: no setting finished up on average, and the $300 worst path still fell 45.07%.
See Where it looked stronger or weaker below for the setting-by-setting read.
How often did paths make money?
50 / 100 best · CyberVest EA gold @ $5000 deposit
Each bar is one test. Height = share of paths that finished in profit — not the same as average $.
How the tests work
Gold (XAUUSD) only. CyberVest EA ran alone: no other EA in the test. Each run used 100 paths. The baseline is $1,000, 90 days, 1% risk, lot 0.01. The other runs change one thing: 0.5% risk, 2% risk, a $300 deposit, a $5,000 deposit, or a 180-day window. The $300 run is above the listed 250 USD minimum.
- Symbol: XAUUSD
- Paths per test: 100
- Typical window: 90 days · deposit 1000 · lot 0.01 · risk 1%
- Market mix: random (uptrend, downtrend, range, chop, and shock paths)
- Engine: Hosted FX EA Tester (this EA alone)
- Coverage: 6 tests · 100 paths each
There is no rank and no “wins” score, because nothing else was in the test.
Average profit is the mean dollar result. Paths in profit is how many of the 100 paths finished up. Drawdown is the usual dip and the worst path.
How to read each test
Where CyberVest EA looked stronger
These lines are account settings for CyberVest EA by itself. They are not a ranking against other gold EAs.
Looked better in
- $5,000 account — smallest percent loss, −$71.62, about −1.4%, with 50 of 100 paths in profit
- 0.5% risk vs 1% and 2% — the $1,000 0.5% test lost less (−$25.65) than 1% or 2%
- Average drawdown on $5,000 — 8.53%, the lowest in this set
Looked weaker in
- $300 account — −$27.86, about −9.3%, with a 45.07% worst path
- 2% risk — −$60.17 and a 40.29% worst path
- $1,000 baseline — −$37.24, about −3.7%, with 40 of 100 paths in profit
Results one test at a time
One test at a time — this EA alone, with a different deposit, risk, or window. Look at profit, drawdown, and the short note for each.
CyberVest EA gold baseline
What stood out in this test
Also notable: −$37.24 is about −3.7%. The worst path fell 26.35% and closed at −$231.25. No path washed the account out.
How CyberVest EA did in this test
CyberVest EA gold @ 0.5% risk
What stood out in this test
Also notable: This is the 0.5% risk test on $1,000. It lost less than the 1% baseline. The worst path fell 27.70% and closed at −$277.05.
How CyberVest EA did in this test
CyberVest EA gold @ 2% risk
What stood out in this test
Also notable: This is the 2% risk test. It was the weakest $1,000 average. The worst path fell 40.29% and closed at −$382.03.
How CyberVest EA did in this test
CyberVest EA gold @ $300 deposit
What stood out in this test
Also notable: On a $300 deposit, −$27.86 is about −9.3%. That size is above the listed 250 USD minimum. Average drawdown was the highest in the 90-day set. The worst path fell 45.07% and closed at −$122.32.
How CyberVest EA did in this test
CyberVest EA gold @ $5000 deposit
What stood out in this test
Also notable: This is the smallest percent loss in the set, about −1.4% on $5,000. Half of the paths finished up, but the mean was still minus. The worst path fell 28.74% and closed at −$1,430.09.
How CyberVest EA did in this test
CyberVest EA gold @ 180-day window
What stood out in this test
Also notable: This is the 180-day window on $1,000. The average was about −3.5%, close to the 90-day baseline. The worst path fell 27.94% and closed at −$256.39.
How CyberVest EA did in this test
Related on Orion: gold EA store · risk disclosure · backtesting limits
So… is CyberVest EA worth trying?
Where it looked stronger or weaker
These lines are account settings for CyberVest EA by itself. They are not a ranking against other gold EAs.
Better in these test mixes
- $5,000 account — smallest percent loss, −$71.62, about −1.4%, with 50 of 100 paths in profit
- 0.5% risk vs 1% and 2% — the $1,000 0.5% test lost less (−$25.65) than 1% or 2%
- Average drawdown on $5,000 — 8.53%, the lowest in this set
Weaker in these test mixes
- $300 account — −$27.86, about −9.3%, with a 45.07% worst path
- 2% risk — −$60.17 and a 40.29% worst path
- $1,000 baseline — −$37.24, about −3.7%, with 40 of 100 paths in profit
Strong points
- No account washouts in these tests
- On $5,000 the percent loss was about −1.4%, the smallest in this set, with 50 of 100 paths in profit
- Average drawdown on $5,000 was 8.53%, the lowest in this set
- 0.5% risk lost less than 1% or 2% on $1,000
Weak points
- All six averages were minus, including the $1,000 baseline (−$37.24)
- The $300 test lost $27.86, about −9.3%, with a 45.07% worst path
- The 2% risk worst path fell 40.29%
- Half of the $5,000 paths finished up, but the mean was still −$71.62
- Recovery can add size after a loss
Reasons it may fit you
- You want the solo numbers before you use it
- You will demo it on XAUUSD M5 first
- You will leave recovery off until a demo is clear
Reasons to be careful
- You need a plus average on these gold tests
- You do not want a recovery option in the inputs
Our take
In six solo gold tests — this EA only — every average was minus. The $1,000 baseline lost $37.24. The smallest dollar loss on $1,000 was 0.5% risk, at −$25.65. The $5,000 test lost $71.62 (about −1.4%). The $300 test lost $27.86, about −9.3%, with a 45.07% worst path.
Our take: Cautious — weaker results in these tests. Demo it on gold M5 with recovery off first, a small lot, and the listed 250 USD floor in mind before any live use.
These tests run this EA by itself on gold. They are research tests — not live trading. Read the risk disclosure.
What the run looked like
Screens from FX EA Tester while the tests ran — real test progress, not ad images.
CyberVest EA gold baseline
CyberVest EA gold @ $5000 deposit
FAQ
Where do I get CyberVest EA?
From the official MetaTrader 5 product page linked on this page. Version 3.20, priced at 125 USD.
Is this the same as Cyber Grid BB XAU Edition?
No. Cyber Grid BB XAU Edition is a different Market product. This page covers only CyberVest EA (product 180143).
How much does it cost?
125 USD.
Does it use recovery?
The product page describes adaptive recovery and lot scaling in the inputs. You can turn recovery off. Confirm that on a demo.
What does it need to run?
MetaTrader 5, a hedging account, and XAUUSD on M5 with two-decimal quotes. The listed minimum deposit is 250 USD. Leverage 1:100 or higher.
What chart should I use?
The product page specifies XAUUSD on M5 only.
How were the gold tests run?
This EA alone. No other EA was in the test. Six settings, 100 gold paths each.
How did it do?
All six averages were minus. The $1,000 baseline was −$37.24. The $5,000 test was −$71.62. The 180-day test was −$34.87.
Where did it look stronger?
On $5,000 the average was −$71.62, about −1.4%, with 50 of 100 paths in profit. That was the smallest percent loss. On $1,000, 0.5% risk lost less than 1%.
How deep was the drawdown?
Average max drawdown was about 8.5% to 14.7%. The worst path was 45.07% on $300, 26.35% on the $1,000 baseline, and 28.74% on $5,000.
Are these live trading results?
No. These are FX EA Tester gold paths, not live trading.
What to do next
1) Note the main finding: a minus average on every setting, including −$37.24 on the $1,000 baseline.
2) Demo it on XAUUSD M5 with recovery off, a small lot, and at least the listed 250 USD before any live use.
3) ZIP downloads are the path reports for each setting.
More gold EAs with experiments
Research test results are not live trading performance. Orion publishes honest test-based reviews so you can check setup, profit, and risk before you try an EA — not financial advice. Official downloads stay on MetaTrader Market. Read the risk disclosure.