MT5 gold EA · XAUUSD · H1
One Gold MT5 Download — H1 Gold EA with Recovery Mode
One Gold MT5 is a MetaTrader 5 gold (XAUUSD) EA for the H1 chart with Conservative and Intensive+Recovery modes, a built-in news filter and risk that adapts to leverage. In independent 90-day XAUUSD tests against other gold EAs it averaged positive on all 14 boards, led wins on 2 and had the best average on 4.
What is One Gold MT5?
The EA trades gold on the 1-hour chart. You pick a risk level; the listing names a Conservative mode from $100 and an Intensive Mode+Recovery from $500. It also has a built-in news filter and automatic risk adjustment based on account leverage. Neural-network wording on the listing cannot be checked from outside.
To see how it held up next to other gold EAs, we ran it through 14 FX EA Tester gold tests with the same rules for every EA — the results are on this page.
- H1 timeframe on gold
- 2 modes: Conservative / Intensive+Recovery
- $100 minimum in Conservative mode
- 14/14 gold boards with plus average
How One Gold MT5 trades
Conservative mode is aimed at smaller accounts (from $100) and lower risk. Intensive Mode+Recovery needs from $500 and includes a recovery function after losing trades. Low-risk / Conservative use can run on 1:30 leverage; higher risk needs more.
A news filter can pause trading around major announcements. The listing also describes automatic risk-leverage adaptation, so lot size tracks the account's leverage.
What you can set
If you want more control, the listing says there are many optimization settings for risk, news filter and trade behaviour. Start in Conservative mode on demo before you try Intensive+Recovery, because recovery changes how the EA trades after losses.
Avoid cent accounts and high-spread gold feeds if you can — the listing warns results may be weaker there.
Broker presets
- Attach on XAUUSD — H1 chart
- Pick Conservative or Intensive+Recovery risk
- From $100 (Conservative) or $500 (Intensive+Recovery)
- 1:30 leverage for low risk / Conservative
- Turn on the news filter; avoid high-spread / cent accounts
Specs
- Platform
- MT5 (separate MT4 edition)
- Pair
- XAUUSD (gold)
- Timeframe
- H1
- Price
- $195 to buy (2 Oct 2026); listing says next price $750. MT4 edition $255.55
- Developer
- Stanislav Tomilov
- Version
- 8.1 (updated 28 Aug 2026; first published 11 Oct 2023)
- Modes
- Conservative (from $100); Intensive Mode+Recovery (from $500)
- News filter
- Built-in; adjustable
- Risk
- Pick a risk level; automatic risk-leverage adaptation
- Leverage
- 1:30 suitable for low risk / Conservative
- Activations
- 10
Requirements
- MetaTrader 5 (or the separate MT4 edition)
- Gold / XAUUSD on the H1 chart
- From $100 for Conservative, or $500 for Intensive+Recovery
- 1:30 leverage for low risk; more for higher risk
- A broker with normal gold spreads (not cent / high-spread if you can avoid it)
A good fit if you
- want an H1 gold EA with a simple risk-level setup
- want a news filter and leverage-aware risk sizing
- can start small in Conservative mode from $100
- accept that Intensive mode includes recovery after losses
- want an independent check before paying $195
Not a fit if you need
- a strict no-recovery EA — Intensive mode includes recovery
- cent accounts or very high gold spreads
- an EA that always leads at 0.5% risk — it was mid-table there
- a live Myfxbook / broker statement copied here as proof
Key risks and how to reduce them
What can go wrong
- Intensive Mode+Recovery can raise exposure after losses — demo that mode before live use.
- Higher risk levels need more leverage than 1:30.
- Neural-network claims cannot be checked from outside — judge by results, not the label.
- The listing price is set to rise toward $750 as copies sell.
- Spread and broker type still matter on gold H1.
Safer first steps
- Demo on your own broker for several weeks.
- Start in Conservative mode at a low risk level.
- Turn on the news filter.
- Only then try Intensive+Recovery, and watch how lots change after losses.
- Set your own maximum account-loss limit before going live.
What to know before you download
- Choose MT5 (price $195) or the separate MT4 edition (price $255.55).
- Know the two modes: Conservative from $100, Intensive+Recovery from $500.
- List price was $195 on 2 Oct 2026 — check the live figure before it rises.
- Turn on the news filter and avoid high-spread / cent accounts if you can.
- Independent 90-day gold tests were positive on all 14 boards, with first place on wins on 2 — read them before you buy.
Independent gold tests
- Coverage: 14 tests · 71 other gold EAs · 100 paths each · 90 days (one 180-day board)
- Profit: positive average on all 14 boards, from +$11.67 (0.5% risk) to +$79.70 (2% risk) on $1000
- Wins: first on 2 boards (2% risk and $5000); top three on 10 boards
- Best average on 4 boards (mixed popular, MT4, hybrid, 2% risk)
- Usual drawdown about 8.8–10.6%; worst $1000 paths about 19–31%
Did it make money on average?
Yes — it made money on average in every test
We ran 14 separate gold tests (different peer mixes and account settings). Each line below is one test’s average dollar result — not wins.
Full boards, method, and rankings are in the test section below.
Download One Gold MT5
Version 8.1. An MT4 edition (One Gold MT4) is sold separately for $255.55. Setup is an XAUUSD H1 chart plus a risk level. Demo first — gold results below are an independent check on XAUUSD.
How to install
- Install on MetaTrader 5 and run it on demo first.
- Attach the EA to an XAUUSD chart on the H1 timeframe.
- Start in Conservative mode at a low risk level.
- Turn on the news filter; use a VPS if you leave it running 24/7.
Listing checked 2 Oct 2026. Price can change.
Other options to compare
Compare when: you want another H1 gold EA from the same developer
Vortex Gold EA is also by Stanislav Tomilov, uses two strategies with a hard stop, and has its own research page.
Compare when: you want a free MT4 gold EA instead of a paid MT5 product
Orion uses stop-based risk and can be downloaded from this site.
Test results for One Gold MT5
- 14 tests
- 71 other EAs
- 100 paths each
Results breakdown
• Profit: positive average on all 14 tests. On $1000 boards it ranged from +$11.67 (0.5% risk) to +$79.70 (2% risk); +$23.91 on $300 and +$47.54 on $5000.
• Wins: first on 2 boards (2% risk and $5000). Top three on 10 boards. Never last.
• Averages: best on the board on 4 tests (mixed popular, MT4, hybrid, 2% risk).
• Drawdown: average max drawdown about 8.8–10.6%. Worst paths about 19–31% on $1000, 21.34% on $300 and 25.65% on $5000. 50–73 of 100 paths ended in profit, with no washouts.
• Bottom line: strong overall, especially at 2% risk and on mixed / MT4 boards; clearly weaker at 0.5% risk.
See Where it looked stronger or weaker below for the condition-by-condition read.
How often did paths make money?
73 / 100 best · One Gold MT5 mixed gold @ 180-day window
Each bar is one test. Height = share of paths that finished in profit — not the same as average $.
Where did it finish on wins?
#1 best finish · One Gold MT5 gold @ 2% risk (26 firsts)
Shorter bar = better win rank. First on wins can still lose money on average.
How the tests work
Gold (XAUUSD) boards only. One Gold MT5 ran with nine other EAs per board, on the same deposit, lot and risk settings and the same 100 paths over 90 days (180 days on the longer-window board). Across the 14 tests it met 71 other gold EAs.
Conditions covered: mixed popular, MT4, MT5, scalper, trend, AI, hybrid and grid fields, plus 0.5% and 2% risk, $300 and $5000 accounts, and a 180-day window. Leaderboards show this EA as "One Gold".
- Symbol: XAUUSD
- Paths per test: 100
- Typical window: 90 days · deposit 1000 · lot 0.01 · risk 1%
- Market mix: random (uptrend, downtrend, range, chop, and shock paths)
- Engine: Hosted FX EA Tester (same rules for every EA in a test)
- Coverage: 14 tests · 71 other EAs · 100 paths each
For One Gold MT5, the averages are often near the top of the board, but wins and averages do not always match. On some boards it had the best average without the most first places.
Paths in profit (50–73 of 100) and worst drawdown show how far a single path could go. Path-type notes are FX EA Tester labels.
How to read each test
EAs in the main comparison
One Gold MT5 ran with 9 other EAs in the main test (One Gold MT5 vs mixed gold popular) . Across all tests it faced 71 different other EAs.
One Gold MT5
Where One Gold MT5 looked stronger
Fit by condition uses FX EA Tester peer groups, not a live product claim.
Looked better in
- 2% risk — first on wins (26/100) and best average (+$79.70), 71/100 in profit
- Mixed popular — best average (+$69.88), #2 on wins (16/100)
- MT4 field — best average (+$66.66), #4 on wins
- Hybrid field — best average (+$41.82), #3 on wins (tied)
- $5000 account — first on wins (15/100)
Looked weaker in
- 0.5% risk — #6 on wins (9/100), +$11.67, only 51/100 in profit
- Scalper group — deepest $1000 worst path (30.79%)
- $5000 account — only 50/100 paths in profit; worst path −$1,279.51 (25.65% DD)
- Grid / recovery stress — #7 on wins (7/100), though average stayed +$57.91
Results one test at a time
One test at a time — different other EAs and account settings. Look at profit, drawdown, and the short note for each.
One Gold MT5 vs mixed gold popular
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were strong-uptrend / sideways-tight style paths. Average profit was strongest on strong-uptrend paths in this board.
Also notable: Scalping Robot Pro led wins (22) with average +$51.89. One Gold MT5 had the best average here. Its worst path fell 23.50% and closed at −$234.95.
One Gold MT5 vs gold MT4 field
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were sideways-tight / sideways-wide style paths. Average profit was strongest on sideways-wide paths in this board.
Also notable: Scalping Robot Pro led wins (17) with average +$23.55. One Gold MT5 had the best average here. Its worst path fell 19.46% and closed at +$0.24.
One Gold MT5 vs gold MT5 field
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were high-volatility-chop / sideways-tight style paths. Average profit was strongest on sideways-wide paths in this board.
Also notable: Scalping Robot Pro led wins (24) with average +$68.29. The Gold Reaper had the best average (+$78.75). Its worst path fell 24.80% and closed at −$245.33.
One Gold MT5 vs gold scalpers
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were low-volatility-quiet / high-volatility-chop style paths. Average profit was strongest on strong-downtrend paths in this board.
Also notable: AurumEdge Scalper Pro led wins (25) with average +$85.29. Its worst path fell 30.79% and closed at −$236.52 — its deepest in this set.
One Gold MT5 vs gold trend peers
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were gradual-bull paths. Average profit was strongest on sideways-wide paths in this board.
Also notable: Gold Vanguard EA led wins (20) with average +$84.70. Its worst path fell 23.15% and closed at −$206.55.
One Gold MT5 vs gold scalper field
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were gradual-bull / sideways-wide style paths. Average profit was strongest on sideways-tight paths in this board.
Also notable: Adaptive Gold Scalper led wins (18) with average +$89.17. Its worst path fell 22.71% and closed at −$194.96.
One Gold MT5 vs gold grid / recovery stress
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were gradual-bear / gradual-bull style paths. Average profit was strongest on strong-uptrend paths in this board.
Also notable: Gold House led wins (17) with average +$38.55. Gold Vanguard EA had the best average (+$105.38). Its worst path fell 19.61% and closed at −$138.63.
One Gold MT5 vs gold AI peers
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were gradual-bull / sideways-tight style paths. Average profit was strongest on strong-downtrend paths in this board.
Also notable: Gold Zilla AI led wins (22) with average +$60.94. Aurum AI had the best average (+$66.89). Its worst path fell 19.71% and closed at −$154.31.
One Gold MT5 vs gold hybrid peers
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were strong-uptrend / high-volatility-chop style paths. Average profit was strongest on strong-uptrend paths in this board.
Also notable: Sharkyra Gold led wins (18) with average +$40.53. One Gold MT5 had the best average here. Its worst path fell 23.83% and closed at −$213.25.
One Gold MT5 gold @ 0.5% risk
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were news-shock / strong-downtrend style paths. Average profit was strongest on news-shock paths in this board.
Also notable: The Gold Reaper led wins (16) with average +$24.24. TwisterPro Scalper had the best average (+$33.22). Its worst path fell 29.71% and closed at −$291.18.
One Gold MT5 gold @ 2% risk
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were gradual-bear / gradual-bull style paths. Average profit was strongest on sideways-tight paths in this board.
Also notable: One Gold MT5 had the best average here. Its worst path fell 21.06% and closed at −$194.25.
One Gold MT5 gold @ $300 deposit
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were sideways-wide paths. Average profit was strongest on sideways-wide paths in this board.
Also notable: Byrdi led wins (20) with average +$19.59. GOLD Scalper PRO had the best average (+$29.50). On a $300.00 deposit, +$23.91 is about +8.0%. Its worst path fell 21.34% and closed at −$62.60.
One Gold MT5 gold @ $5000 deposit
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were gradual-bear paths. Average profit was strongest on gradual-bear paths in this board.
Also notable: Sharkyra Gold had the best average (+$60.71). On a $5,000.00 deposit, +$47.54 is about +1.0%. Its worst path fell 25.65% and closed at −$1,279.51.
One Gold MT5 mixed gold @ 180-day window
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were gradual-bear / news-shock style paths. Average profit was strongest on news-shock paths in this board.
Also notable: Gold Zilla AI led wins (28) with average +$93.54. Its worst path fell 24.04% and closed at +$1.40.
Full ranking for the main test
Full results for One Gold MT5 vs mixed gold popular. Wins mean finished first on a path — not the same as “always made profit.”
| Rank | EA | Wins | Avg profit | Avg return | Avg DD | Worst DD | Washouts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
22 | $51.89 | 5.19% | 9.87% | 32.53% | 0 |
| 2 |
|
16 | $69.88 | 6.99% | 8.95% | 23.50% | 0 |
| 3 |
|
15 | $63.81 | 6.38% | 7.54% | 13.67% | 0 |
| 4 |
|
13 | $52.30 | 5.23% | 8.04% | 19.90% | 0 |
| 5 |
|
11 | $66.49 | 6.65% | 9.17% | 26.08% | 0 |
| 6 |
|
11 | $27.66 | 2.77% | 9.19% | 23.61% | 0 |
| 7 |
|
5 | -$2.42 | -0.24% | 10.88% | 85.60% | 0 |
| 8 |
|
4 | -$6.45 | -0.65% | 10.38% | 21.09% | 0 |
| 9 |
|
2 | -$34.04 | -3.40% | 11.34% | 32.20% | 0 |
| 10 |
|
1 | -$22.73 | -2.27% | 10.56% | 24.73% | 0 |
Related on Orion: gold EA store · risk disclosure · backtesting limits
So… is One Gold MT5 worth trying?
Where it looked stronger or weaker
Fit by condition uses FX EA Tester peer groups, not a live product claim.
Better in these test mixes
- 2% risk — first on wins (26/100) and best average (+$79.70), 71/100 in profit
- Mixed popular — best average (+$69.88), #2 on wins (16/100)
- MT4 field — best average (+$66.66), #4 on wins
- Hybrid field — best average (+$41.82), #3 on wins (tied)
- $5000 account — first on wins (15/100)
Weaker in these test mixes
- 0.5% risk — #6 on wins (9/100), +$11.67, only 51/100 in profit
- Scalper group — deepest $1000 worst path (30.79%)
- $5000 account — only 50/100 paths in profit; worst path −$1,279.51 (25.65% DD)
- Grid / recovery stress — #7 on wins (7/100), though average stayed +$57.91
Strong points
- Positive average on all 14 boards, no washouts
- First on wins at 2% risk and on the $5000 account
- Best average on 4 boards, including the mixed popular board (+$69.88)
- Top three on wins on 10 of 14 boards
- Simple setup: pick a risk level on XAUUSD H1
Weak points
- Weaker at 0.5% risk (#6 on wins, +$11.67, 51/100 in profit)
- Worst $1000 path reached 30.79% in the scalper group
- Only 50/100 paths in profit on the $5000 account
- Intensive mode includes recovery — not a pure single-trade style
- Neural-network claims cannot be verified from outside
Reasons it may fit you
- You want a gold EA that led or nearly led several independent boards
- You can use Conservative mode first and keep risk moderate
- You will demo Intensive+Recovery before live use
Reasons to be careful
- You need strong results at very low (0.5%) risk
- You refuse any recovery behaviour after losses
- You only trust live Myfxbook / broker results
Our take
In these 90-day gold tests it was one of the stronger results in this series. It averaged positive on all 14 boards, led wins on 2, had the best average on 4 and finished top three on wins on 10. The clear weak spot was 0.5% risk, where it was mid-table.
Our take: Balanced — solid in several areas, with clear limits. Worth a demo if you like H1 gold and can accept recovery in Intensive mode. Downloads stay on MetaTrader Market.
Every EA in a test uses the same FX EA Tester rules. We show results even when this EA is not first. These are research tests — not live trading. Read the risk disclosure.
Other strong gold EAs to consider
No EA won every test. If One Gold MT5 is not the right fit — or you want a second option — start here.
When: You want the EA that led the mixed popular board on wins
Scalping Robot Pro has a full research page and led the mixed popular board on wins (22/100), while One Gold had the best average there.
When: You want a stronger result at 0.5% risk
The Gold Reaper has a full research page, led the 0.5% risk board on wins and had the best average on the MT5 board (+$78.75).
When: You want a gold EA that led the trend board
Gold Vanguard has a full research page, led the trend board (+$84.70) and had the best average on grid stress (+$105.38).
When: You want a stronger result in a scalper field
Adaptive Gold Scalper has a full research page and led the scalper field on wins and average (+$89.17).
What the run looked like
Screens from FX EA Tester while the tests ran — real test progress, not ad images.
One Gold MT5 gold @ 0.5% risk
One Gold MT5 gold @ 2% risk
FAQ
Where do I download One Gold MT5?
The Download link on this page goes to the official MetaTrader 5 product. An MT4 edition is sold separately. Demo first before any live use.
Is One Gold MT5 the same as Vortex Gold EA?
No. Both are by Stanislav Tomilov, but they are separate products. This page covers One Gold MT5 only.
How much does One Gold MT5 cost?
It was $195 to buy on 2 Oct 2026. The listing says the price rises toward $750 as copies sell. The MT4 edition was $255.55. Check the download page for the current price.
What are Conservative and Intensive+Recovery?
Conservative is the lower-deposit mode (from $100). Intensive Mode+Recovery needs from $500 and includes a recovery function after losing trades. Demo Intensive mode before you use it live.
What does it need to run?
MetaTrader 5, an XAUUSD H1 chart, and from $100 for Conservative mode. Low risk can use 1:30 leverage. A normal gold spread helps; cent and high-spread accounts are weaker per the listing.
How did it do in the gold tests?
Strong overall. It averaged positive on all 14 boards over 90 days, led wins on 2 boards, had the best average on 4, and finished top three on wins on 10 boards.
Where did it do best?
At 2% risk it was first on wins and best on average (+$79.70). It also had the best average on the mixed popular (+$69.88), MT4 and hybrid boards.
Where was it weaker?
At 0.5% risk it was #6 on wins with a +$11.67 average and only 51 of 100 paths in profit. The deepest $1000 worst path was 30.79% in the scalper group.
How deep was the drawdown?
Average max drawdown stayed between about 8.8% and 10.6%. Worst paths reached about 19–31% on $1000 boards, 21.34% on the $300 account and 25.65% on $5000.
Is One Gold MT5 worth $195?
In these tests it was one of the stronger gold EAs we checked at this price, especially at 2% risk and on mixed boards. Still demo first, start Conservative, and compare The Gold Reaper if you need better low-risk results.
Did it face 100 gold EAs at once?
No. 14 gold boards, 71 unique other EAs, 10 per board.
Are these live trading results?
No. These are FX EA Tester gold boards, not live trading results. Marketplace reviews and live signals are not checked here.
What to do next
1) Note the main finding: positive on all 14 boards, first on wins twice, best average on 4.
2) Compare Scalping Robot Pro MT5 and The Gold Reaper MT5 below if you want other leaders.
3) ZIP downloads are optional rank files.
4) If you try it, demo in Conservative mode with the news filter on before Intensive+Recovery.
More gold EAs with experiments
Research test results are not live trading performance. Orion publishes honest test-based reviews so you can check setup, profit, and risk before you try an EA — not financial advice. Official downloads stay on MetaTrader Market. Read the risk disclosure.