Gold EA store / SixtyNine EA

MT5 gold EA · independent tests

SixtyNine EA Download — Six-Layer Gold EA for MT5

SixtyNine EA is a MetaTrader 5 gold (XAUUSD) EA that runs six strategy layers at the same time. Every trade has a stop loss, take profit and trailing stop, and it uses no grid, martingale or recovery. In independent 90-day XAUUSD tests it averaged plus on 13 of 14 boards, but it never finished first on wins and most averages were modest.

MT5 only · XAUUSD · H1 / H4 · Stop loss on every trade

Download See the tests

What is SixtyNine EA?

SixtyNine EA is by Farzad Saadatinia. It is an automated MetaTrader 5 Expert Advisor for gold (XAUUSD), run on the H1 or H4 chart.

It combines six strategy layers that work at the same time, each with its own entry and trade-management settings. Every trade gets a stop loss, a take profit and a trailing stop. The listing says it does not use grid, martingale, recovery trades or lot multiplication, and it does not open buy and sell hedges at the same time.

The listing leads with a live MQL5 signal. Independent FX EA Tester gold boards on this page used the same money rules for every EA across different market conditions — results are below.
  • 6 strategy layers
  • $1000+ recommended deposit
  • $399 list price (29 Sep 2026)
  • 13/14 gold boards with plus average

How SixtyNine EA trades

The EA watches XAUUSD on H1 or H4 and waits until one of its six strategy layers sees a setup. It can buy or sell, but it trades in one direction at a time rather than hedging. Trades usually stay open from a few minutes to a few hours.

Each trade is closed by its take profit, its stop loss or the trailing stop. Because several layers can be active, more than one trade can be open at once — but it does not add trades to rescue a losing one.

What you can customize

The main choice is lot sizing: Fixed Lot, Auto Lot or Risk of Previous Trade. The listing says results change a lot between these modes, so test each on demo. You can also trade five days a week or pick your own days and hours.

After you buy, the seller prepares set files for your account size and risk level, from conservative to aggressive. Most users only change lot size and risk. Change one setting at a time on demo so you can see what it does.

Starting setup

  • Attach on XAUUSD, H1 or H4 chart
  • Ask the seller for a set file that fits your account size
  • Deposit $1000 or more ($300 minimum for very small lots)
  • Use a reliable ECN / RAW account
  • Run it on a VPS so it stays online

Specs

Platform
MT5 only
Price
$399 to buy; the listing says the next price is $699 and the final price $999 (29 Sep 2026)
Version
1.30 (updated 2 Aug 2026; first published 11 Jun 2026)
Author
Farzad Saadatinia
Strategy
Six strategy layers; stop loss, take profit and trailing stop on every trade; no grid, martingale, recovery or hedging
Market
XAUUSD, H1 or H4
Account
$300 minimum, $1000+ recommended; ECN / RAW broker; VPS recommended
Activations
10

Requirements

  • MetaTrader 5
  • SixtyNine EA download file
  • A gold (XAUUSD) H1 or H4 chart on an ECN / RAW account
  • A VPS if you leave it running
  • Demo first on the same broker you plan to use later

A good fit if you

  • want an MT5 gold EA with a stop loss on every trade
  • want to avoid grid, martingale and recovery systems
  • have $1000 or more and want a set file matched to your account
  • want to see independent results before you spend money
  • will demo for a while before any live use

Not a fit if you need

  • a board leader — it was never first on wins here, and top three on only 3 of 14 boards
  • a gold scalper that beats other scalpers — it was #6 on wins in the scalper field with the second-lowest average there
  • a small-account EA — its $300 board had one of its deepest worst paths (about 30%)
  • an MT4 version — it is MT5 only
  • a live Myfxbook / broker statement copied here as proof

Key risks and how to reduce them

What can go wrong

  • Some averages were small or negative (−$2.27 on the mixed popular board, +$3.10 on the AI board).
  • Worst paths reached about 19–30% drawdown on $1000 boards, and about 30% on the $300 account.
  • Results change a lot between lot-sizing modes, and the recommended set files are shared after purchase, so you cannot check them before you buy.
  • Several layers can have trades open at the same time, so exposure can build up on a fast gold move.
  • The live signal on the listing is not confirmed here.

Safer first steps

  • Demo on the same broker and VPS you plan to use later.
  • Start with Fixed Lot and a small size before you try Auto Lot.
  • Use at least the recommended $1000 deposit, or a much smaller lot on less.
  • Do not raise risk after a loss.
  • Read the per-board results below before you size up.

What to know before you download

  • Confirm you use MetaTrader 5 — there is no MT4 version.
  • List price was $399 on 29 Sep 2026, with a stated next price of $699 — check the live figure.
  • Know the model: six strategy layers, stop loss and trailing on every trade, no grid or martingale.
  • Independent 90-day gold tests were plus on average in 13 of 14 boards, but it never led a board on wins.
  • Demo first; automated trading can lose capital.

Independent gold tests

A no-grid design and a strong live-signal story still need a side-by-side check. We ran locked 90-day FX EA Tester boards across different market conditions. Here is the short read before you download.
  • Coverage: 14 tests · 71 other gold EAs · 100 paths each · 90 days (one 180-day board)
  • Wins: never first; #3 on the 0.5% risk, 2% risk and $5000 account boards, and top three on only those 3 of 14
  • Profit: plus average in 13 of 14 tests; second-best average on the $5000 board (+$147.02) and third-best at 0.5% risk (+$20.79)
  • Weakest: mixed popular board (−$2.27, 47/100 in profit), and #8 on wins on grid stress and the $300 account
  • Usual drawdown about 8.2–11.5%; worst paths about 19–30% on $1000 boards and about 30% on $300

Did it make money on average?

Mixed — made money on average in 13 of 14 tests

We ran 14 separate gold tests (different peer mixes and account settings). Each line below is one test’s average dollar result — not wins.

Best average profit$147.02SixtyNine EA gold @ $5000 deposit
Biggest average loss-$2.27SixtyNine EA vs mixed gold popular
SixtyNine EA vs mixed gold popularLost money-$2.27
SixtyNine EA vs gold MT4 peersMade money$19.03
SixtyNine EA vs gold MT5 peersMade money$9.61
SixtyNine EA vs gold scalpersMade money$15.69
SixtyNine EA vs gold trend peersMade money$12.10
SixtyNine EA vs gold scalper peersMade money$4.51
SixtyNine EA vs gold grid / recovery stressMade money$14.87
SixtyNine EA vs gold AI peersMade money$3.10
SixtyNine EA vs gold hybrid peersMade money$27.52
SixtyNine EA gold @ 0.5% riskMade money$20.79
SixtyNine EA gold @ 2% riskMade money$19.26
SixtyNine EA gold @ $300 depositMade money$10.62
SixtyNine EA gold @ $5000 depositMade money$147.02
SixtyNine EA mixed gold @ 180-day windowMade money$21.60
Full rankings for each test are in the board cards below.

One more catch: wins ≠ profit

On the SixtyNine EA vs mixed gold popular test it finished first most often — and still lost money on average.

Finished first#66 of 100 paths
Average result-$2.27-0.2% return · same test
47 of 100paths made money
$271.85best single path
-$227.14worst single path
10.5%avg DD · worst 26%
Almost half the paths can finish green and the average can still be a loss when the losing paths are larger.
FX EA Tester leaderboard from the SixtyNine EA $5000 account board
Real FX EA Tester capture from the $5000 account board — #3 on wins (10/100, tied) with a +$147.02 average, the second-best there.

Full boards, method, and rankings are in the test section below.

Download SixtyNine EA

Download SixtyNine EA for MetaTrader 5 from the link below. Paid gold EA — $399 to buy as of 29 Sep 2026 (the listing says the next price is $699).

Version 1.30. Demo first. Gold results below are an independent check on XAUUSD.

How to install

  1. Install the MT5 file from the download link.
  2. Message the seller for a set file that fits your account size and risk.
  3. Attach the EA on an XAUUSD H1 or H4 chart with Algo Trading enabled, using a small lot on demo.
  4. Use a VPS if you leave it running.

Listing checked 29 Sep 2026. Price can change.

Download

Other options to compare

Orion Gold Scalper

Compare when: you want a free MT4 gold EA built for XAUUSD

Orion Gold Scalper is this site's own EA and can be downloaded here.

TwisterPro Scalper

Compare when: you want another MT5 gold EA with a stop loss on every trade

TwisterPro Scalper has a full product and research page on this site.

The product section covers features, setup, and the short gold-test snapshot. The section below shows each locked FX EA Tester gold run in full — method, other EAs in each test, results, and the ranking table.

Test results for SixtyNine EA

  • 14 tests
  • 71 other EAs
  • 100 paths each

Results breakdown

What stood out

• Wins: never first. #3 on the 0.5% risk (12/100), 2% risk (10/100, tied) and $5000 account (10/100, tied) boards — top three on 3 of 14. #7 or #8 on the MT4, MT5, grid stress and $300 boards.
• Profit: plus average in 13 of 14 tests, from +$3.10 (AI field) to +$27.52 (hybrid field) on $1000; +$147.02 on $5000 (second-best there) and +$21.60 over 180 days. Only the mixed popular board was negative (−$2.27).
• Risk level: +$20.79 at 0.5% risk, +$19.26 at 2% risk — similar results either way.
• Drawdown: average max drawdown about 8.2–11.5%. Worst paths about 19–30% on $1000 and about 30% on $300. 47–63 of 100 paths ended in profit.
• Bottom line: steady but modest plus averages, with no board wins.

See Where it looked stronger or weaker below for the condition-by-condition read.

How often did paths make money?

63 / 100 best · SixtyNine EA gold @ $300 deposit

Each bar is one test. Height = share of paths that finished in profit — not the same as average $.

Weakest here: SixtyNine EA vs mixed gold popular (47/100). A board can clear ~half its paths and still lose money on average.

Where did it finish on wins?

#3 best finish · SixtyNine EA gold @ 0.5% risk (12 firsts)

Shorter bar = better win rank. First on wins can still lose money on average.

Pair this with average $ in the Independent check above — wins and profit are separate scores.

How the tests work

Gold (XAUUSD) boards only. SixtyNine EA and nine other EAs per board, with the same money settings and the same 100 paths over 90 days. FX EA Tester runs it as a multi-strategy EA with a stop loss on every trade and no grid, as the listing describes.

Fourteen gold conditions: mixed popular, MT4, MT5, scalper, trend, AI, hybrid and grid fields, plus 0.5% and 2% risk, $300 and $5000 accounts, and a 180-day window. The tests do not use the seller's private set files, so treat them as a general check of the design, not of any one set file.

  • Symbol: XAUUSD
  • Paths per test: 100
  • Typical window: 90 days · deposit 5000 · lot 0.01 · risk 1%
  • Market mix: random (uptrend, downtrend, range, chop, and shock paths)
  • Engine: Hosted FX EA Tester (same rules for every EA in a test)
  • Coverage: 14 tests · 71 other EAs · 100 paths each

For this EA, compare the account-size and risk boards with the peer-field boards. It placed higher on the $5000 account and the 0.5% and 2% risk boards, and lower against the mixed popular, MT4, MT5 and grid fields.

Paths in profit tell you how often a run ended above the deposit. Average DD vs worst DD is the risk split. Path-type notes are FX EA Tester regime labels.

How to read each test

WinsFinished first on a path — not the same as profit
Average $Mean result across the paths — main money signal
Paths in profitHow often it made money on a path
DrawdownUsual pain vs the worst path you must survive

Re-run in FX EA Tester

EAs in the main comparison

SixtyNine EA ran with 9 other EAs in the main test (SixtyNine EA gold @ $5000 deposit) . Across all tests it faced 71 different other EAs.

SixtyNine EA SixtyNine EA

Where SixtyNine EA looked stronger

Fit by condition uses FX EA Tester peer groups, not a live product claim.

Looked better in

  • $5000 account — #3 on wins (10/100, tied), second-best average (+$147.02), 61/100 in profit
  • 0.5% risk — #3 on wins (12/100), third-best average (+$20.79), 61/100 in profit
  • 2% risk — #3 on wins (10/100, tied), +$19.26, lowest worst path (19.16%)
  • Hybrid peer field — #5 on wins, +$27.52, 60/100 in profit
  • 180-day window — #4 on wins, fourth-best average (+$21.60)

Looked weaker in

  • Mixed popular field — only negative average (−$2.27), 47/100 in profit
  • Grid stress — #8 on wins (3/100), worst path 30.43%
  • $300 account — #8 on wins, worst path 29.66%
  • MT4 and MT5 fields — #7 on wins, bottom-half averages
  • Scalper field — #6 on wins, #9 on average (+$4.51)

Results one test at a time

One test at a time — different other EAs and account settings. Look at profit, drawdown, and the short note for each.

SixtyNine EA vs mixed gold popular

$1000 · 1% risk · 90d

EAs in this test

Scalping Robot Pro Quantum OmniGold The Gold Reaper TwisterPro Scalper Smart Gold Hunter SixtyNine EA Zerqon EA Ultimate Breakout System AXIO Gold EA Goldwave EA

What stood out in this test

SixtyNine EA: #6 on wins (6/100), average −$2.27, avg DD 10.45%, profitable 47/100.

Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were news-shock / sideways-tight style paths. Average profit was strongest on news-shock paths in this board.

Also notable: Scalping Robot Pro led wins (27) with average +$57.63. TwisterPro Scalper had the best average (+$80.49). Its worst path fell 26.35% and closed at −$214.21.
How SixtyNine EA did in this test
Rank#6 of 10
Wins6 / 100
Avg profit-$2.27
Avg DD10.45%
Worst DD26.35%
Paths in profit47 / 100
Download full report (ZIP) Re-run in FX EA Tester

SixtyNine EA vs gold MT4 field

$1000 · 1% risk · 90d

EAs in this test

Scalping Robot Pro The Gold Reaper Gold Zilla AI BB Return XG Gold Robot GOLD Scalper PRO SixtyNine EA Gold Trade Pro XIRO Robot Straddle

What stood out in this test

SixtyNine EA: #7 on wins (4/100), average +$19.03, avg DD 9.62%, profitable 58/100.

Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were strong-uptrend / gradual-bear style paths. Average profit was strongest on strong-uptrend paths in this board.

Also notable: Scalping Robot Pro led wins (27) with average +$98.82. Its worst path fell 22.20% and closed at −$193.30.
How SixtyNine EA did in this test
Rank#7 of 10
Wins4 / 100
Avg profit$19.03
Avg DD9.62%
Worst DD22.20%
Paths in profit58 / 100
Download full report (ZIP) Re-run in FX EA Tester

SixtyNine EA vs gold MT5 field

$1000 · 1% risk · 90d

EAs in this test

Scalping Robot Pro The Gold Reaper Smart Gold Hunter Quantum OmniGold TwisterPro Scalper Ultimate Breakout System SixtyNine EA Zerqon EA Goldwave EA AXIO Gold EA

What stood out in this test

SixtyNine EA: #7 on wins (4/100, tied), average +$9.61, avg DD 9.69%, profitable 52/100.

Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were gradual-bear paths. Average profit was strongest on high-volatility-chop paths in this board.

Also notable: Scalping Robot Pro led wins (27) with average +$69.23. The Gold Reaper had the best average (+$70.30). Its worst path fell 26.46% and closed at −$249.98.
How SixtyNine EA did in this test
Rank#7 of 10
Wins4 / 100
Avg profit$9.61
Avg DD9.69%
Worst DD26.46%
Paths in profit52 / 100
Download full report (ZIP) Re-run in FX EA Tester

SixtyNine EA vs gold scalpers

$1000 · 1% risk · 90d

EAs in this test

AurumEdge Scalper Pro GOLD Scalper PRO TwisterPro Scalper SixtyNine EA The Buster XAU Single Entry TNG Gold Luna AI Pro SuperScalp Gold Mavrik Scalper Wave Rider EA

What stood out in this test

SixtyNine EA: #4 on wins (12/100), average +$15.69, avg DD 9.54%, profitable 54/100.

Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were gradual-bull / gradual-bear style paths. Average profit was strongest on high-volatility-chop paths in this board.

Also notable: AurumEdge Scalper Pro led wins (27) with average +$80.11. Its worst path fell 21.28% and closed at −$174.32.
How SixtyNine EA did in this test
Rank#4 of 10
Wins12 / 100
Avg profit$15.69
Avg DD9.54%
Worst DD21.28%
Paths in profit54 / 100
Download full report (ZIP) Re-run in FX EA Tester

SixtyNine EA vs gold trend peers

$1000 · 1% risk · 90d

EAs in this test

Gold Vanguard EA Swing Breakout EA CRT Model 1 SixtyNine EA Trend Matrix EA The Golden Staircase GoldZ AI Boring Gold EA Xauusd Trend RSI Strategy Gold Sniper Ravex Algo Spider Gold

What stood out in this test

SixtyNine EA: #4 on wins (11/100), average +$12.10, avg DD 10.01%, profitable 50/100.

Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were sideways-tight paths. Average profit was strongest on gradual-bull paths in this board.

Also notable: Gold Vanguard EA led wins (22) with average +$89.93. Its worst path fell 28.69% and closed at −$278.29.
How SixtyNine EA did in this test
Rank#4 of 10
Wins11 / 100
Avg profit$12.10
Avg DD10.01%
Worst DD28.69%
Paths in profit50 / 100
Download full report (ZIP) Re-run in FX EA Tester

SixtyNine EA vs gold scalper field

$1000 · 1% risk · 90d

EAs in this test

Adaptive Gold Scalper Chiquita Golden Goose Scalper AI GOLD Scalper PRO AurumEdge Scalper Pro SixtyNine EA OrionXAU Leto Apex Scalper SuperScalp Gold Vortex Turbo EA

What stood out in this test

SixtyNine EA: #6 on wins (8/100), average +$4.51, avg DD 10.17%, profitable 51/100.

Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were high-volatility-chop paths. Average profit was strongest on high-volatility-chop paths in this board.

Also notable: Adaptive Gold Scalper led wins (22) with average +$90.72. Its worst path fell 25.99% and closed at −$240.37.
How SixtyNine EA did in this test
Rank#6 of 10
Wins8 / 100
Avg profit$4.51
Avg DD10.17%
Worst DD25.99%
Paths in profit51 / 100
Download full report (ZIP) Re-run in FX EA Tester

SixtyNine EA vs gold grid / recovery stress

$1000 · 1% risk · 90d

EAs in this test

Lizard Vex Gold EA GoldStorm Pro EA Gold Vanguard EA GoldSpire Impulse Gold House SixtyNine EA XAU Marti H1Trend LNT Gold X100

What stood out in this test

SixtyNine EA: #8 on wins (3/100), average +$14.87, avg DD 9.81%, profitable 59/100.

Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were gradual-bull paths. Average profit was strongest on low-volatility-quiet paths in this board.

Also notable: Lizard led wins (20) with average +$63.92. Gold Vanguard EA had the best average (+$76.16). Its worst path fell 30.43% and closed at −$299.78 — its deepest in this set.
How SixtyNine EA did in this test
Rank#8 of 10
Wins3 / 100
Avg profit$14.87
Avg DD9.81%
Worst DD30.43%
Paths in profit59 / 100
Download full report (ZIP) Re-run in FX EA Tester

SixtyNine EA vs gold AI peers

$1000 · 1% risk · 90d

EAs in this test

Gold Zilla AI Aurum AI One Gold Neurox AI SixtyNine EA AI Gold Prime Straddle AI Prime Execution AI EA Helios Gold AI AI Prop Firms

What stood out in this test

SixtyNine EA: #5 on wins (8/100), average +$3.10, avg DD 9.87%, profitable 47/100.

Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were sideways-tight / gradual-bull style paths. Average profit was strongest on sideways-tight paths in this board.

Also notable: Gold Zilla AI led wins (20) with average +$69.65. Its worst path fell 20.49% and closed at −$190.52.
How SixtyNine EA did in this test
Rank#5 of 10
Wins8 / 100
Avg profit$3.10
Avg DD9.87%
Worst DD20.49%
Paths in profit47 / 100
Download full report (ZIP) Re-run in FX EA Tester

SixtyNine EA vs gold hybrid peers

$1000 · 1% risk · 90d

EAs in this test

Sharkyra Gold Quantum Valkyrie XG Gold Robot BB Return SixtyNine EA Nexorion Initium Novum EA Cortex Aurex Obsidian Flow Atlas EA Gold Snap XIRO Robot

What stood out in this test

SixtyNine EA: #5 on wins (12/100, tied), average +$27.52, avg DD 9.56%, profitable 60/100.

Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were high-volatility-chop / sideways-wide style paths. Average profit was strongest on sideways-tight paths in this board.

Also notable: Sharkyra Gold led wins (17) with average +$66.20. Its worst path fell 24.22% and closed at −$216.56.
How SixtyNine EA did in this test
Rank#5 of 10
Wins12 / 100
Avg profit$27.52
Avg DD9.56%
Worst DD24.22%
Paths in profit60 / 100
Download full report (ZIP) Re-run in FX EA Tester

SixtyNine EA gold @ 0.5% risk

$1000 · 0.5% risk · 90d

EAs in this test

The Gold Reaper Smart Gold Hunter SixtyNine EA Byrdi Safe Haven Gold EA SwissSniperEA TwisterPro Scalper AXIO Gold EA CRT Model 1 Zerqon EA

What stood out in this test

SixtyNine EA: #3 on wins (12/100), average +$20.79, avg DD 9.21%, profitable 61/100.

Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were sideways-tight / sideways-wide style paths. Average profit was strongest on sideways-tight paths in this board.

Also notable: The Gold Reaper led wins (20) with average +$43.31. Its worst path fell 20.58% and closed at −$205.28.
How SixtyNine EA did in this test
Rank#3 of 10
Wins12 / 100
Avg profit$20.79
Avg DD9.21%
Worst DD20.58%
Paths in profit61 / 100
Download full report (ZIP) Re-run in FX EA Tester

SixtyNine EA gold @ 2% risk

$1000 · 2% risk · 90d

EAs in this test

Prisma Gold Zilla AI SixtyNine EA Helios Gold AI TNG Gold The Buster XAU Single Entry Mosquito Prime Execution AI EA Mavrik Scalper Wave Rider EA

What stood out in this test

SixtyNine EA: #3 on wins (10/100, tied), average +$19.26, avg DD 9.49%, profitable 50/100.

Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were gradual-bull / sideways-wide style paths. Average profit was strongest on strong-uptrend paths in this board.

Also notable: Prisma led wins (35) with average +$95.13. Its worst path fell 19.16% and closed at −$145.33.
How SixtyNine EA did in this test
Rank#3 of 10
Wins10 / 100
Avg profit$19.26
Avg DD9.49%
Worst DD19.16%
Paths in profit50 / 100
Download full report (ZIP) Re-run in FX EA Tester

SixtyNine EA gold @ $300 deposit

$300 · 1% risk · 90d

EAs in this test

TwisterPro Scalper TNG Gold GoldSpire Byrdi Ultimate Breakout System GOLD Scalper PRO Smart Gold Hunter SixtyNine EA SuperScalp Gold Spider Gold

What stood out in this test

SixtyNine EA: #8 on wins (9/100, tied), average +$10.62, avg DD 11.48%, profitable 63/100.

Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were strong-uptrend / high-volatility-chop style paths. Average profit was strongest on strong-uptrend paths in this board.

Also notable: TwisterPro Scalper led wins (16) with average +$28.96. On a $300.00 deposit, +$10.62 is about +3.5%. Its worst path fell 29.66% and closed at −$66.04.
How SixtyNine EA did in this test
Rank#8 of 10
Wins9 / 100
Avg profit$10.62
Avg DD11.48%
Worst DD29.66%
Paths in profit63 / 100
Download full report (ZIP) Re-run in FX EA Tester

SixtyNine EA mixed gold @ 180-day window

$1000 · 1% risk · 180d

EAs in this test

Gold Zilla AI Prisma Helios Gold AI SixtyNine EA Yukon Mosquito ArtQuant Gold The Buster XAU Single Entry Prime Execution AI EA Mavrik Scalper

What stood out in this test

SixtyNine EA: #4 on wins (8/100), average +$21.60, avg DD 10.87%, profitable 55/100.

Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were sideways-wide paths. Average profit was strongest on sideways-wide paths in this board.

Also notable: Gold Zilla AI led wins (41) with average +$88.36. Its worst path fell 20.68% and closed at −$189.78.
How SixtyNine EA did in this test
Rank#4 of 10
Wins8 / 100
Avg profit$21.60
Avg DD10.87%
Worst DD20.68%
Paths in profit55 / 100
Download full report (ZIP) Re-run in FX EA Tester

Full ranking for the main test

Full results for SixtyNine EA gold @ $5000 deposit. Wins mean finished first on a path — not the same as “always made profit.”

Rank EA Wins Avg profit Avg return Avg DD Worst DD Washouts
1 Aureum Quant 16 $167.43 3.35% 7.47% 17.10% 0
2 CasperIT Adaptive Market Intelligence Trader 14 $52.60 1.05% 8.02% 17.37% 0
3 SixtyNine EA this EA 10 $147.02 2.94% 8.20% 22.43% 0
4 Sharkyra Gold 10 $93.93 1.88% 8.28% 17.78% 0
5 Quantum Valkyrie 10 $85.99 1.72% 8.22% 19.10% 0
6 Nexorion Initium Novum EA 10 $76.33 1.53% 8.39% 23.10% 0
7 Obsidian Flow Atlas EA 9 $79.08 1.58% 8.43% 22.32% 0
8 Cortex Aurex 8 $63.65 1.27% 8.46% 17.81% 0
9 Smart Gold Impulse 8 $43.54 0.87% 8.48% 24.74% 0
10 Trend Catcher exp 5 $10.27 0.21% 6.60% 21.26% 0
Download full test report (ZIP) Re-run test

Related on Orion: gold EA store · risk disclosure · backtesting limits

So… is SixtyNine EA worth trying?

Our take: Mixed — strengths and weak spots both show

Where it looked stronger or weaker

Fit by condition uses FX EA Tester peer groups, not a live product claim.

Better in these test mixes

  • $5000 account — #3 on wins (10/100, tied), second-best average (+$147.02), 61/100 in profit
  • 0.5% risk — #3 on wins (12/100), third-best average (+$20.79), 61/100 in profit
  • 2% risk — #3 on wins (10/100, tied), +$19.26, lowest worst path (19.16%)
  • Hybrid peer field — #5 on wins, +$27.52, 60/100 in profit
  • 180-day window — #4 on wins, fourth-best average (+$21.60)

Weaker in these test mixes

  • Mixed popular field — only negative average (−$2.27), 47/100 in profit
  • Grid stress — #8 on wins (3/100), worst path 30.43%
  • $300 account — #8 on wins, worst path 29.66%
  • MT4 and MT5 fields — #7 on wins, bottom-half averages
  • Scalper field — #6 on wins, #9 on average (+$4.51)

Strong points

  • Plus average on 13 of 14 boards
  • Second-best average on the $5000 account board (+$147.02, #3 on wins)
  • #3 on wins at 0.5% risk (12/100), with the third-best average (+$20.79)
  • Its highest $1000 average came on the hybrid field (+$27.52, 60/100 in profit)
  • No account washouts in these tests

Weak points

  • Never first on wins; top three on only 3 of 14 boards
  • Mixed popular board: −$2.27, 47/100 in profit, 26.35% worst path
  • #8 on wins on grid stress (3/100), with its deepest worst path (30.43%)
  • #8 on wins on the $300 account, with a 29.66% worst path
  • Scalper field: #6 on wins, #9 on average

Reasons it may fit you

  • You want an honest check of a trending paid MT5 gold EA before you spend money or demo time
  • You care about average profit, not only wins or the listing's live signal
  • You accept gold risk and will demo before using real money

Reasons to be careful

  • You want an EA that leads boards on wins
  • You want a gold scalper that beats other scalpers
  • You only trust live Myfxbook / broker results

Our take

SixtyNine EA has a careful design: six strategy layers, a stop loss, take profit and trailing stop on every trade, and no grid, martingale or recovery. In these 90-day gold tests it averaged plus on 13 of 14 boards, and it placed #3 on wins on the $5000 account and both risk boards.

The limits are clear too. It never led a board on wins, most averages were modest next to the leaders, and the mixed popular board averaged slightly negative. On the MT4, MT5, grid and $300 boards it finished in the bottom half on wins.

Our take: Mixed — strengths and weak spots both show. The safety design and steady plus averages are real positives, but the tests do not show it beating the stronger gold EAs. If it appeals to you, demo first on a $1000+ account with a small fixed lot. Downloads stay on MetaTrader Market.

Every EA in a test uses the same FX EA Tester rules. We show results even when this EA is not first. These are research tests — not live trading. Read the risk disclosure.

Other strong gold EAs to consider

No EA won every test. If SixtyNine EA is not the right fit — or you want a second option — start here.

Gold Vanguard EA

When: You want a gold EA that beat SixtyNine EA on the trend and grid boards

Gold Vanguard has a full research page, led the trend board (+$89.93), and had the best average on grid stress (+$76.16).

TwisterPro Scalper

When: You want another MT5 gold EA with a stop loss on every trade

TwisterPro Scalper has a full research page and had the best average on the mixed popular (+$80.49) and $300 account (+$28.96) boards.

Scalping Robot Pro MT5

When: You want a gold EA that led the mixed popular, MT4 and MT5 boards

Scalping Robot Pro has a full research page and led those three boards on wins, with the best average on MT4 (+$98.82).

Orion Gold Scalper

When: You want this site's own free gold EA

Orion Gold Scalper has a full locked-test review with peer boards and a balanced take.

FAQ

What does SixtyNine EA trade?

Gold (XAUUSD) on the H1 or H4 chart. It is an MT5 EA that runs six strategy layers and can trade both buy and sell setups.

Does it use grid or martingale?

The listing says no — no grid, martingale, recovery trades or lot multiplication, and no buy and sell hedges at the same time. Every trade has a stop loss, take profit and trailing stop.

What account does it need?

The listing recommends $1000 or more, with $300 as a minimum for very small lots or testing. It also recommends a reliable ECN / RAW broker and a VPS.

Is there an MT4 version?

No. SixtyNine EA is sold for MetaTrader 5 only.

How did it do in the gold tests?

It averaged plus on 13 of 14 boards over 90 days. On $1000 boards the plus averages ran from +$3.10 (AI field) to +$27.52 (hybrid field); it was +$147.02 on the $5000 account and +$21.60 over 180 days. The only negative average was the mixed popular board (−$2.27).

Where did it look strongest?

On the $5000 account board it was #3 on wins (10/100, tied) with the second-best average (+$147.02). It was also #3 on wins at 0.5% risk (third-best average, +$20.79) and at 2% risk (+$19.26). It never finished first on any board.

What drawdown did it show?

Average max drawdown was about 8.2–11.5%. Worst paths were about 19–30% on $1000 boards (deepest on grid stress, 30.43%) and about 30% on the $300 account, so size small.

Is SixtyNine EA worth $399?

The design is careful — a stop loss on every trade and no grid — and it was plus on 13 of 14 boards. But it never led a board, it was top three on only 3, and most averages were well below the board leaders. If you want to try it, demo first at low risk and compare it with the EAs below.

Which gold EAs looked better in tests?

Scalping Robot Pro led the mixed popular, MT4 and MT5 boards on wins. TwisterPro Scalper had the best average on the mixed popular and $300 boards. Gold Vanguard EA led the trend board and had the best average on grid stress. All have full research pages.

Did it face 100 gold EAs at once?

14 gold boards, 71 unique other EAs, 10 per board. Not 100 at once.

Do you have live results here?

No. These are FX EA Tester gold boards only — not live trading results. The live signal on the listing is not checked here.

What to do next

1) Note the 13/14 plus averages — but no board wins and only 3 top-three finishes.
2) Compare Gold Vanguard EA, TwisterPro Scalper or Scalping Robot Pro below if you want stronger results.
3) ZIP downloads are optional rank files.
4) If you still want to try it, demo first with Fixed Lot and a small size on a $1000+ account.

More gold EAs with experiments

Research test results are not live trading performance. Orion publishes honest test-based reviews so you can check setup, profit, and risk before you try an EA — not financial advice. Official downloads stay on MetaTrader Market. Read the risk disclosure.