MT5 single-entry gold EA · independent tests
GoldZ AI MT5 Download — Single-Entry Gold EA for MT5
GoldZ AI MT5 is a MetaTrader 5 Expert Advisor for gold (XAUUSD): one trade per direction, real stop loss and take profit, and news, spread and equity filters — no grid or martingale. Independent 90-day XAUUSD tests against other gold EAs across different market conditions were plus on average in 13 of 14 boards, mostly by modest amounts.
What is GoldZ AI MT5?
The listing adds a smart trailing stop, daily profit and loss limits, equity protection, a news filter, spread protection, and Friday close. It recommends low spread, fast execution, and a VPS. Demo carefully before you raise size.
Independent FX EA Tester gold boards on this page used the same money rules across different market conditions — results are below.
- MT5 platform
- Single entry no grid / martingale
- $349 list price (25 Sep 2026)
- 13/14 gold boards with plus average
How GoldZ AI MT5 trades
Around the entries sit several filters. A news filter can pause trading around high, medium, or low impact events for the currencies you pick. Spread protection blocks entries when spread is too wide. Daily profit and loss limits, equity protection, and market-close / Friday close rules stop trading at set points. "AI" is part of the product name; the listing does not show a machine-learning model making the trades.
What you can customize
Start with a small lot on demo and change one setting at a time so you can see what hurt the account.
Starting setup
- Attach on XAUUSD (product focus)
- Use a low-spread, fast-execution account and a VPS
- Turn on the daily loss limit and equity protection
- Start with a small lot on demo — the listing does not state a minimum deposit
Specs
- Platform
- MT5 only (the MT4 version is no longer listed)
- Price
- $349 (25 Sep 2026)
- Version
- 3.0 (updated 25 Aug 2026)
- Author
- Mohamed Baseer Mohamed Sabraj
- Strategy
- Single-entry XAUUSD trades with SL / TP and trailing
- Protection
- News, spread, daily limit, equity and Friday-close filters
- Account note
- Low spread · fast execution · VPS recommended (product)
Requirements
- MetaTrader 5
- GoldZ AI MT5 download file
- XAUUSD chart on a low-spread, fast-execution account
- A VPS if you leave it running
- Demo first on the same broker and VPS you plan to use later
A good fit if you
- want a single-entry MT5 gold EA with no grid or martingale
- like built-in news, spread, and daily-loss filters
- can start with small lots and demo for a while
- accept modest plus averages (mostly +$9 to +$29 on $1000 over 90 days)
- will stay on demo until you understand drawdown on your broker
Not a fit if you need
- proof that the protection filters produced a strong edge on these gold boards
- an MT4 version — only the MT5 listing is still live
- “AI” as proof of machine-learning trades
- a small-account EA — one $300 path fell 61.68%
- a live Myfxbook / broker statement copied here as proof
Key risks and how to reduce them
What can go wrong
- A stop loss on every trade limits each loss, but losses can still add up.
- Filters can skip trades; they do not make losing trades win.
- Worst paths reached about 20–40% on $1000 boards and 61.68% on the $300 account in these tests.
- A higher price does not buy large averages — most plus boards here were under +$30 on $1000.
- Market conditions and broker paths change; demo first.
Safer first steps
- Demo on the same broker and VPS you plan to use later.
- Start with a small lot on XAUUSD.
- Set the daily loss limit and equity protection before any live use.
- Do not raise size after a loss.
- Read the gold boards below before you treat the filter list as a reason to buy.
What to know before you download
- Confirm you need MT5 and use the GoldZ AI MT5 download.
- List price was $349 on 25 Sep 2026 — check the live figure.
- Know the model: single entry, SL / TP, trailing, news and equity filters.
- Independent 90-day gold tests were plus on average in 13 of 14 boards, mostly modest.
- Demo first; automated trading can lose capital.
Independent gold tests
- Coverage: 14 tests · 74 other gold EAs · 100 paths each · 90 days (one 180-day board)
- Headline result: plus average in 13 of 14 tests; best on $1000 was the MT5 field (+$52.49)
- Never first on wins — best finish was #2 on the mixed popular board (14/100)
- Only red board: the scalper field (−$8.52, #8 on wins)
- Usual drawdown about 8.3–12.2%; worst paths about 20–40% on $1000, 61.68% on $300
Did it make money on average?
Mixed — made money on average in 13 of 14 tests
We ran 14 separate gold tests (different peer mixes and account settings). Each line below is one test’s average dollar result — not wins.
One more catch: wins ≠ profit
On the GoldZ AI MT5 vs gold scalper peers test it finished first most often — and still lost money on average.
Full boards, method, and rankings are in the test section below.
Download GoldZ AI MT5
Version 3.0. Demo first. Gold results below are an independent check on XAUUSD.
How to install
- Install the MT5 file from the download link.
- Attach the EA on XAUUSD with Algo Trading enabled.
- Set the daily loss limit and start with a small lot on demo.
- Use a VPS if you leave it running. Confirm behavior on demo before any live use.
Listing checked 25 Sep 2026. Price can change.
Other options to compare
Compare when: you want a free MT4 gold EA built for XAUUSD
Orion uses stop-based risk and can be downloaded from this site.
Compare when: you want another researched MT5 gold EA
Gold Vanguard also has a full product and research page and averaged plus on all 14 boards on its own page.
Test results for GoldZ AI MT5
- 14 tests
- 74 other EAs
- 100 paths each
Results breakdown
• Profit: plus average in 13 of 14 tests. Best on $1000 was the MT5 field (+$52.49); the $5000 board made +$105.11. The only red board was the scalper field (−$8.52).
• Against other EAs: never first on wins. #2 on the mixed popular board (14/100); #3 on the MT5, trend, hybrid, 2% risk and 180-day boards.
• Leaders: Scalping Robot Pro took the mixed, MT4 and MT5 boards with +$101 to +$114.
• Risk: average max drawdown about 8.3–12.2%. Worst paths about 20–40% on $1000, and 61.68% on $300.
• Bottom line: a clean single-entry design with mostly modest plus averages and one very deep small-account path.
See Where it looked stronger or weaker below for the condition-by-condition read.
How often did paths make money?
66 / 100 best · GoldZ AI MT5 vs mixed gold popular
Each bar is one test. Height = share of paths that finished in profit — not the same as average $.
Where did it finish on wins?
#2 best finish · GoldZ AI MT5 vs mixed gold popular (14 firsts)
Shorter bar = better win rank. First on wins can still lose money on average.
How the tests work
Only gold (XAUUSD) boards. GoldZ AI MT5 plus nine others, same money settings, 100 paths, 90-day window (180 days on the longer-window board).
Fourteen gold conditions. The catalog lists this product twice, so the duplicate entry was kept out of every board — it never faced itself.
- Symbol: XAUUSD
- Paths per test: 100
- Typical window: 90 days · deposit 1000 · lot 0.01 · risk 1%
- Market mix: random (uptrend, downtrend, range, chop, and shock paths)
- Engine: Hosted FX EA Tester (same rules for every EA in a test)
- Coverage: 14 tests · 74 other EAs · 100 paths each
For this EA, a plus average did not mean a calm worst case — the $300 board averaged plus but had a 61.68% worst path. Use average profit, paths in profit and worst DD together.
Average DD vs worst DD is the risk split. Path-type notes are FX EA Tester regime labels.
How to read each test
EAs in the main comparison
GoldZ AI MT5 ran with 9 other EAs in the main test (GoldZ AI MT5 vs gold MT5 field) . Across all tests it faced 74 different other EAs.
GoldZ AI MT5
Where GoldZ AI MT5 looked stronger
Fit by condition uses FX EA Tester peer groups, not a live product claim.
Looked better in
- MT5 mixed field — #3 on wins, +$52.49, its best $1000 average
- Mixed popular board — #2 on wins (14/100), +$28.59, 66/100 in profit
- Hybrid peer field — #3 on wins, +$25.24, calmest worst path (19.82%)
- Large $5000 account — +$105.11 (about +2.1%)
Looked weaker in
- Scalper peer field — −$8.52, #8 on wins
- Small $300 account — +$3.46, highest average DD (12.21%), 61.68% worst path
- Grid / recovery stress — #7 on wins, +$8.75
- 180-day window — #3 on wins, but a 40.09% worst path
Results one test at a time
One test at a time — different other EAs and account settings. Look at profit, drawdown, and the short note for each.
GoldZ AI MT5 vs mixed gold popular
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were gradual-bear / sideways-wide style paths. Average profit was strongest on high-volatility-chop paths in this board.
Also notable: Scalping Robot Pro led wins (40) with average +$101.70. Its worst path fell 32.98% and closed at −$271.34.
GoldZ AI MT5 vs gold MT4 field
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were sideways-wide / gradual-bull style paths. Average profit was strongest on strong-downtrend paths in this board.
Also notable: Scalping Robot Pro led wins (36) with average +$104.62. Its worst path fell 26.10% and closed at −$247.06.
GoldZ AI MT5 vs gold MT5 field
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were gradual-bull / high-volatility-chop style paths. Average profit was strongest on strong-uptrend paths in this board.
Also notable: Scalping Robot Pro led wins (36) with average +$114.20. Its worst path fell 26.59% and closed at −$243.41.
GoldZ AI MT5 vs gold scalpers
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were news-shock / strong-uptrend style paths. Average profit was strongest on news-shock paths in this board.
Also notable: AurumEdge Scalper Pro led wins (29) with average +$81.57. Its worst path fell 26.32% and closed at −$252.55.
GoldZ AI MT5 vs gold trend peers
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were sideways-wide paths. Average profit was strongest on sideways-wide paths in this board.
Also notable: Gold Vanguard EA led wins (24) with average +$70.48. Its worst path fell 23.56% and closed at −$235.56.
GoldZ AI MT5 vs gold scalper field
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were high-volatility-chop / strong-downtrend style paths. Average profit was strongest on high-volatility-chop paths in this board.
Also notable: AurumEdge Scalper Pro led wins (26) with average +$91.14. Adaptive Gold Scalper had the best average (+$112.79). Its worst path fell 30.98% and closed at −$299.17.
GoldZ AI MT5 vs gold grid / recovery stress
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were low-volatility-quiet / gradual-bear style paths. Average profit was strongest on gradual-bull paths in this board.
Also notable: Lizard led wins (16) with average +$66.40. Its worst path fell 24.15% and closed at −$238.87.
GoldZ AI MT5 vs gold AI peers
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were news-shock / strong-uptrend style paths. Average profit was strongest on news-shock paths in this board.
Also notable: One Gold led wins (20) with average +$40.26. Gold Zilla AI had the best average (+$55.36). Its worst path fell 21.44% and closed at −$201.50.
GoldZ AI MT5 vs gold hybrid peers
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were strong-uptrend paths. Average profit was strongest on strong-uptrend paths in this board.
Also notable: Sharkyra Gold led wins (18) with average +$61.25. Its worst path fell 19.82% and closed at −$193.27.
GoldZ AI MT5 gold @ 0.5% risk
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were sideways-wide / gradual-bear style paths. Average profit was strongest on strong-uptrend paths in this board.
Also notable: CRT Model 1 led wins (22) with average +$22.23. Byrdi had the best average (+$32.80). Its worst path fell 24.42% and closed at −$183.56.
GoldZ AI MT5 gold @ 2% risk
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were low-volatility-quiet / sideways-wide style paths. Average profit was strongest on strong-uptrend paths in this board.
Also notable: Prisma led wins (31) with average +$89.52. Its worst path fell 33.59% and closed at −$333.78.
GoldZ AI MT5 gold @ $300 deposit
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were strong-uptrend / strong-downtrend style paths. Average profit was strongest on strong-uptrend paths in this board.
Also notable: GOLD Scalper PRO led wins (20) with average +$28.51. On a $300.00 deposit, +$3.46 is about +1.2%. Its worst path fell 61.68% and closed at −$93.22 — its deepest in this set.
GoldZ AI MT5 gold @ $5000 deposit
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were strong-uptrend / sideways-tight style paths. Average profit was strongest on sideways-tight paths in this board.
Also notable: Quantum Valkyrie led wins (15) with average +$221.86. On a $5,000.00 deposit, +$105.11 is about +2.1%. Its worst path fell 24.80% and closed at −$1,240.07.
GoldZ AI MT5 mixed gold @ 180-day window
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were gradual-bear / low-volatility-quiet style paths. Average profit was strongest on strong-downtrend paths in this board.
Also notable: Gold Zilla AI led wins (29) with average +$84.63. Prisma had the best average (+$85.63). Its worst path fell 40.09% and closed at +$0.59.
Full ranking for the main test
Full results for GoldZ AI MT5 vs gold MT5 field. Wins mean finished first on a path — not the same as “always made profit.”
| Rank | EA | Wins | Avg profit | Avg return | Avg DD | Worst DD | Washouts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
36 | $114.20 | 11.42% | 9.65% | 28.40% | 0 |
| 2 |
|
13 | $58.19 | 5.82% | 8.50% | 19.73% | 0 |
| 3 |
|
11 | $52.49 | 5.25% | 8.73% | 26.59% | 0 |
| 4 |
|
10 | $54.23 | 5.42% | 8.44% | 17.87% | 0 |
| 5 |
|
9 | $30.19 | 3.02% | 9.87% | 24.70% | 0 |
| 6 |
|
6 | $48.94 | 4.89% | 8.06% | 17.13% | 0 |
| 7 |
|
6 | -$11.28 | -1.13% | 10.41% | 30.34% | 0 |
| 8 |
|
6 | -$24.74 | -2.47% | 11.11% | 32.20% | 0 |
| 9 |
|
2 | -$29.39 | -2.94% | 10.35% | 26.23% | 0 |
| 10 |
|
1 | -$13.35 | -1.33% | 10.54% | 23.08% | 0 |
Related on Orion: gold EA store · risk disclosure · backtesting limits
So… is GoldZ AI MT5 worth trying?
Where it looked stronger or weaker
Fit by condition uses FX EA Tester peer groups, not a live product claim.
Better in these test mixes
- MT5 mixed field — #3 on wins, +$52.49, its best $1000 average
- Mixed popular board — #2 on wins (14/100), +$28.59, 66/100 in profit
- Hybrid peer field — #3 on wins, +$25.24, calmest worst path (19.82%)
- Large $5000 account — +$105.11 (about +2.1%)
Weaker in these test mixes
- Scalper peer field — −$8.52, #8 on wins
- Small $300 account — +$3.46, highest average DD (12.21%), 61.68% worst path
- Grid / recovery stress — #7 on wins, +$8.75
- 180-day window — #3 on wins, but a 40.09% worst path
Strong points
- Plus average on 13 of 14 boards
- MT5 field: #3 on wins, +$52.49, 65/100 in profit
- #2 on wins on the mixed popular board (14/100, +$28.59, 66/100 in profit)
- #3 on wins on the trend, hybrid, 2% risk and 180-day boards
- No account washouts in these tests
Weak points
- Never first on wins
- $300 account: +$3.46 average but a 61.68% worst path
- Scalper field: −$8.52, #8 on wins
- 180-day window: worst path 40.09%
- MT4 version no longer listed, even though older links may still mention it
Reasons it may fit you
- You want an honest check of a paid MT5 gold EA before you spend money or demo time
- You care about average profit, not only first-place finishes
- You accept gold risk and will try a demo before using real money
Reasons to be careful
- You plan to run it on a small account
- You want an EA that leads boards or makes large averages
- You only trust live Myfxbook / broker results
Our take
It may fit better if you mainly want a single-entry MT5 gold EA with no grid or martingale and many built-in filters, and you will demo for a while. It may fit less well on a small account, or if you want an EA that leads boards.
Our take: Mixed — strengths and weak spots both show. Downloads stay on MetaTrader Market.
Every EA in a test uses the same FX EA Tester rules. We show results even when this EA is not first. These are research tests — not live trading. Read the risk disclosure.
Other strong gold EAs to consider
No EA won every test. If GoldZ AI MT5 is not the right fit — or you want a second option — start here.
When: You want another researched MT5 gold EA
Gold Vanguard has a full research page and averaged plus on all 14 boards on its own page. It also led wins on GoldZ’s trend board.
When: You want a gold scalper that held up well against other scalpers
Adaptive Gold Scalper has its own full research page and had the best average on GoldZ’s scalper field (+$112.79).
When: You want the EA that led GoldZ’s mixed, MT4 and MT5 boards
Scalping Robot Pro has a full research page and averaged +$101 to +$114 on those three boards.
When: You want another researched gold scalper option on this site
Orion Gold Scalper has a full locked-test review with peer boards and a balanced take.
FAQ
Is GoldZ AI MT5 only for gold?
The product is designed for XAUUSD. These independent tests are XAUUSD only.
Is there an MT4 version?
Not any more. An MT4 listing existed, but it is no longer on the Market as of 25 Sep 2026. Only the MT5 version is linked here.
Does it use grid or martingale?
The listing says no — no grid, martingale, hedging, or averaging. It opens one trade per direction with a stop loss and take profit.
How did it do in the gold tests?
It averaged plus in 13 of 14 boards over 90 days. The best were the MT5 field (+$52.49) and the $5000 board (+$105.11); most others were +$9 to +$29 on $1000. The only red board was the scalper field (−$8.52). It never led on wins; its best was #2 on the mixed popular board.
Is GoldZ AI MT5 worth $349?
A careful demo can make sense if you want a single-entry EA with built-in filters and you accept modest averages in these tests. Be more careful on a small account — one $300 path fell 61.68%.
Which gold EAs looked better in tests?
On GoldZ’s boards, Scalping Robot Pro led the mixed, MT4 and MT5 boards (up to +$114.20), Gold Vanguard EA led the trend board, and Adaptive Gold Scalper MT5 had the best average on the scalper field (+$112.79). All three have full research pages.
What drawdown did it show?
Average max drawdown was about 8.3–12.2%. The worst path on a $1000 board fell about 20–40% (deepest over 180 days, 40.09%), and 61.68% on the $300 board.
Did it face 100 gold EAs at once?
14 gold boards, 74 unique other EAs, 10 per board. Not 100 at once.
Do you have live results here?
No. These are FX EA Tester gold boards only — not live trading results.
What to do next
1) Weigh 13/14 plus averages against how modest most were and the deep $300 worst path.
2) Compare Gold Vanguard EA or Adaptive Gold Scalper MT5 below if you want stronger averages.
3) ZIP downloads are optional rank files.
4) Demo from the download only after that risk read.
More gold EAs with experiments
Research test results are not live trading performance. Orion publishes honest test-based reviews so you can check setup, profit, and risk before you try an EA — not financial advice. Official downloads stay on MetaTrader Market. Read the risk disclosure.