MT4/MT5 XAUUSD M1 scalper · independent tests
Scalping Robot Pro MT5 Download — XAUUSD M1 Scalper
Scalping Robot Pro MT5 is a MetaTrader Expert Advisor built for gold (XAUUSD) on the M1 timeframe: short-term scalping with selective grid-based trade management, session and news filters, and daily profit / drawdown limits. In independent 90-day XAUUSD tests against other gold EAs it averaged plus on all 14 boards and finished first on wins on 13 of them.
What is Scalping Robot Pro MT5?
There are matching MT4 and MT5 products. After purchase the author routes buyers to a private group and a multi-language manual. Demo carefully — strong test results are not live results, and M1 scalping depends a lot on spread and execution.
- MT4/MT5 platforms
- M1 XAUUSD scalping
- $1,499 list price (22 Sep 2026)
- 14/14 gold boards with plus average
How Scalping Robot Pro MT5 trades
You can limit buy/sell direction, set session hours, and use news, holiday, spread, candle-size, tick-flow, and volatility protections. Optional daily profit and max drawdown limits can stop trading for the day. Take profit, stop loss, and trailing can be fixed or automated.
What you can customize
The product says defaults are tuned so you mainly set lot size for a first tester run. Still start small on demo and change one safety setting at a time.
Starting setup
- Attach on XAUUSD M1
- Set a small lot for demo (product tester note uses $1000 deposit)
- Keep news and drawdown protections on at first
- VPS recommended for M1 scalping
Specs
- Platform
- MT4 and MT5
- Price
- $1,499 (22 Sep 2026; product says next $1,999)
- Version
- 6.0
- Author
- Marzena Maria Szmit
- Strategy
- XAUUSD M1 scalping with selective grid management
- These gold tests
- XAUUSD only
Requirements
- MetaTrader 4 or MetaTrader 5 (matching download)
- Scalping Robot Pro download file
- XAUUSD on M1 with a low-spread broker path when possible
- Enough deposit for your lot size (product notes $1000 minimum)
- Demo first on the same broker and VPS you plan to use later
A good fit if you
- want an XAUUSD M1 scalper with filters and selective grid management to demo
- can run a VPS and keep lots small at first
- want an EA that led most of our gold boards on wins
- accept that the best average on a board often went to another EA
- will stay on demo until you understand drawdown on your broker
Not a fit if you need
- the top average on every board — it had the best average on only 5 of 14
- a strong result against other gold scalpers — the scalper group was its weakest board
- shallow worst cases — worst paths still reached about 24–33% on $1000 boards
- a low-cost first gold EA — this is a high list price
- a live Myfxbook / broker statement copied here as proof
Key risks and how to reduce them
What can go wrong
- Selective grid management can still grow exposure in adverse gold moves.
- M1 scalping is sensitive to spread, slippage, and VPS quality.
- Wrong lot size or loose daily limits can wipe an account quickly.
- Worst paths reached about 24–33% drawdown on $1000 boards and about 34% on $5000, even with plus averages.
- Market conditions and broker paths change; demo first.
Safer first steps
- Demo on the same broker path and VPS you plan to use later.
- Start with a very small lot; keep daily drawdown limits on.
- Do not raise size after a loss.
- Set your own hard account-loss limit before any live use.
- Read the worst-path figures below, not only the win counts, before you size up.
What to know before you download
- Confirm MT4 or MT5 and use the matching Scalping Robot Pro download.
- List price was $1,499 on 22 Sep 2026 (product says next $1,999) — check the live figure.
- Know the model: XAUUSD M1 scalping with selective grid management.
- Independent 90-day gold tests were plus on average in all 14 boards, first on wins in 13.
- Demo first; automated trading can lose capital.
Independent gold tests
- Coverage: 14 tests · 63 other gold EAs · 100 paths each · 90 days (one 180-day board)
- Wins: first on 13 of 14 boards (19–37 first-place paths); #3 on the scalper group board
- Profit: plus average in all 14 tests; best average on 5 (MT4, trend, grid stress, hybrid and 180-day)
- Weakest: scalper group (+$18.15, 48/100 in profit) and $5000 account (+$117.47, #5 on average)
- Usual drawdown about 9.3–11.0%; worst paths about 24–33% on $1000 boards and about 34% on $5000
Did it make money on average?
Yes — it made money on average in every test
We ran 14 separate gold tests (different peer mixes and account settings). Each line below is one test’s average dollar result — not wins.
Full boards, method, and rankings are in the test section below.
Download Scalping Robot Pro MT5
Version 6.0. Demo first. Gold results below are an independent check on XAUUSD.
How to install
- Install the matching MT4 or MT5 file from the download link.
- Attach the EA on XAUUSD M1 with Algo Trading enabled.
- Set a small lot for demo; leave core protections on.
- Use a VPS if you leave it running. Confirm behavior on demo before any live use.
Listing checked 22 Sep 2026. Price can change.
Other options to compare
Compare when: you want a free MT4 gold EA built for XAUUSD
Orion uses stop-based risk and can be downloaded from this site.
Compare when: you want another paid gold scalper with plus averages across many boards
Adaptive has its own full product and research page and averaged plus on all 14 of its boards.
Test results for Scalping Robot Pro MT5
- 14 tests
- 63 other EAs
- 100 paths each
Results breakdown
• Wins: first on 13 of 14 tests (19–37 first-place paths per board). Highest win count: 180-day window (37/100). Only miss: #3 on the scalper group (22/100, tied).
• Profit: plus average in all 14 tests, from +$18.15 (scalper group) to +$75.60 (2% risk) on $1000; +$95.92 over 180 days and +$117.47 on $5000. Best average on 5 boards.
• Risk level: +$30.57 at 0.5% risk, +$75.60 at 2% risk.
• Drawdown: average max drawdown about 9.3–11.0%. Worst paths about 24–33% on $1000, 31% on $300 and 34% on $5000. 48–79 of 100 paths ended in profit.
• Bottom line: the most consistent winner in these tests, but other EAs often had the better average, and worst cases stayed deep.
See Where it looked stronger or weaker below for the condition-by-condition read.
How often did paths make money?
79 / 100 best · Scalping Robot Pro MT5 mixed gold @ 180-day window
Each bar is one test. Height = share of paths that finished in profit — not the same as average $.
Where did it finish on wins?
#1 best finish · Scalping Robot Pro MT5 mixed gold @ 180-day window (37 firsts)
Shorter bar = better win rank. First on wins can still lose money on average.
How the tests work
Only gold (XAUUSD) boards. Scalping Robot Pro MT5 plus nine others, same money settings, the same 100 paths over 90 days.
Fourteen gold conditions: mixed popular, MT4, MT5, scalper, trend, AI, hybrid and grid fields, plus 0.5% and 2% risk, $300 and $5000 accounts, and a 180-day window. Wins and averages are published side by side.
- Symbol: XAUUSD
- Paths per test: 100
- Typical window: 180 days · deposit 1000 · lot 0.01 · risk 1%
- Market mix: random (uptrend, downtrend, range, chop, and shock paths)
- Engine: Hosted FX EA Tester (same rules for every EA in a test)
- Coverage: 14 tests · 63 other EAs · 100 paths each
For this EA, compare wins with the best average on each board. It led on wins almost everywhere, but on nine boards another EA had a higher average.
Average DD vs worst DD is the risk split — worst paths stayed deep even with plus averages. Path types are FX EA Tester labels.
How to read each test
EAs in the main comparison
Scalping Robot Pro MT5 ran with 9 other EAs in the main test (Scalping Robot Pro MT5 mixed gold @ 180-day window) . Across all tests it faced 63 different other EAs.
Scalping Robot Pro MT5
Where Scalping Robot Pro MT5 looked stronger
Fit by condition uses FX EA Tester peer groups, not a live product claim.
Looked better in
- 180-day window — #1 on wins (37/100), best average (+$95.92), 79/100 in profit
- Grid stress — #1 on wins (24/100), best average (+$69.74), 67/100 in profit
- Hybrid peer field — #1 on wins (26/100), best average (+$61.14), 67/100 in profit
- Trend peer field — #1 on wins (31/100), best average (+$55.92)
- 2% risk — #1 on wins (31/100), +$75.60, second-best average
Looked weaker in
- Scalper group — #3 on wins, +$18.15, 48/100 in profit
- $5000 account — #1 on wins but #5 on average, worst path 34.11%
- MT5 mixed field — #1 on wins but #4 on average (+$44.10)
- 0.5% risk — +$30.57, worst path 33.17%
- $300 account — +$25.76, worst path 31.46%
Results one test at a time
One test at a time — different other EAs and account settings. Look at profit, drawdown, and the short note for each.
Scalping Robot Pro MT5 vs mixed gold popular
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were sideways-tight / gradual-bear style paths. Average profit was strongest on strong-downtrend paths in this board.
Also notable: Quantum OmniGold had the best average (+$71.22). Its worst path fell 25.43% and closed at −$247.45.
Scalping Robot Pro MT5 vs gold MT4 field
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were sideways-wide / gradual-bull style paths. Average profit was strongest on sideways-wide paths in this board.
Also notable: Scalping Robot Pro MT5 had the best average here. Its worst path fell 29.25% and closed at −$281.53.
Scalping Robot Pro MT5 vs gold MT5 field
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were gradual-bear / sideways-tight style paths. Average profit was strongest on sideways-tight paths in this board.
Also notable: TwisterPro Scalper had the best average (+$58.30). Its worst path fell 24.82% and closed at −$236.25.
Scalping Robot Pro MT5 vs gold scalping field
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were sideways-wide / high-volatility-chop style paths. Average profit was strongest on high-volatility-chop paths in this board.
Also notable: TwisterPro Scalper led wins (25) with average +$84.10. Its worst path fell 28.34% and closed at −$267.30.
Scalping Robot Pro MT5 vs gold trend field
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were high-volatility-chop / sideways-wide style paths. Average profit was strongest on strong-downtrend paths in this board.
Also notable: Scalping Robot Pro MT5 had the best average here. Its worst path fell 32.76% and closed at −$326.74.
Scalping Robot Pro MT5 vs gold scalper field
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were gradual-bull / gradual-bear style paths. Average profit was strongest on strong-uptrend paths in this board.
Also notable: AurumEdge Scalper Pro had the best average (+$76.85). Its worst path fell 27.13% and closed at −$245.70.
Scalping Robot Pro MT5 vs gold grid/recovery stress
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were sideways-tight / high-volatility-chop style paths. Average profit was strongest on sideways-tight paths in this board.
Also notable: Scalping Robot Pro MT5 had the best average here. Its worst path fell 29.29% and closed at −$278.29.
Scalping Robot Pro MT5 vs gold AI field
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were sideways-wide / sideways-tight style paths. Average profit was strongest on sideways-wide paths in this board.
Also notable: One Gold had the best average (+$60.30). Its worst path fell 24.86% and closed at −$242.90.
Scalping Robot Pro MT5 vs gold hybrid field
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were gradual-bull / gradual-bear style paths. Average profit was strongest on gradual-bear paths in this board.
Also notable: Scalping Robot Pro MT5 had the best average here. Its worst path fell 26.94% and closed at −$260.58.
Scalping Robot Pro MT5 mixed gold @ tight risk 0.5%
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were gradual-bull / sideways-tight style paths. Average profit was strongest on news-shock paths in this board.
Also notable: TwisterPro Scalper had the best average (+$43.26). Its worst path fell 33.17% and closed at −$330.67.
Scalping Robot Pro MT5 mixed gold @ high risk 2%
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were gradual-bear / sideways-tight style paths. Average profit was strongest on high-volatility-chop paths in this board.
Also notable: Prisma had the best average (+$79.79). Its worst path fell 24.74% and closed at −$246.78.
Scalping Robot Pro MT5 mixed gold @ small account $300
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were gradual-bull / gradual-bear style paths. Average profit was strongest on sideways-wide paths in this board.
Also notable: GOLD Scalper PRO had the best average (+$29.00). On a $300.00 deposit, +$25.76 is about +8.6%. Its worst path fell 31.46% and closed at −$89.25.
Scalping Robot Pro MT5 mixed gold @ large account $5000
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were sideways-wide / gradual-bull style paths. Average profit was strongest on sideways-wide paths in this board.
Also notable: Obsidian Flow Atlas EA had the best average (+$195.42). On a $5,000.00 deposit, +$117.47 is about +2.3%. Its worst path fell 34.11% and closed at −$1,694.73 — its deepest in this set.
Scalping Robot Pro MT5 mixed gold @ 180-day window
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were gradual-bull / sideways-wide style paths. Average profit was strongest on news-shock paths in this board.
Also notable: Scalping Robot Pro MT5 had the best average here. Its worst path fell 23.66% and closed at −$205.06.
Full ranking for the main test
Full results for Scalping Robot Pro MT5 mixed gold @ 180-day window. Wins mean finished first on a path — not the same as “always made profit.”
| Rank | EA | Wins | Avg profit | Avg return | Avg DD | Worst DD | Washouts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
37 | $95.92 | 9.59% | 10.69% | 23.66% | 0 |
| 2 |
|
23 | $90.54 | 9.05% | 10.31% | 20.25% | 0 |
| 3 |
|
15 | $80.23 | 8.02% | 9.30% | 22.32% | 0 |
| 4 |
|
9 | $33.95 | 3.39% | 11.04% | 19.68% | 0 |
| 5 |
|
6 | $28.47 | 2.85% | 9.88% | 28.00% | 0 |
| 6 |
|
6 | -$94.70 | -9.47% | 15.92% | 40.44% | 0 |
| 7 |
|
2 | $18.89 | 1.89% | 10.02% | 14.35% | 0 |
| 8 |
|
1 | $4.57 | 0.46% | 9.91% | 27.50% | 0 |
| 9 |
|
1 | -$45.89 | -4.59% | 11.46% | 38.84% | 0 |
| 10 |
|
0 | -$63.68 | -6.37% | 13.06% | 28.39% | 0 |
Related on Orion: gold EA store · risk disclosure · backtesting limits
So… is Scalping Robot Pro MT5 worth trying?
Where it looked stronger or weaker
Fit by condition uses FX EA Tester peer groups, not a live product claim.
Better in these test mixes
- 180-day window — #1 on wins (37/100), best average (+$95.92), 79/100 in profit
- Grid stress — #1 on wins (24/100), best average (+$69.74), 67/100 in profit
- Hybrid peer field — #1 on wins (26/100), best average (+$61.14), 67/100 in profit
- Trend peer field — #1 on wins (31/100), best average (+$55.92)
- 2% risk — #1 on wins (31/100), +$75.60, second-best average
Weaker in these test mixes
- Scalper group — #3 on wins, +$18.15, 48/100 in profit
- $5000 account — #1 on wins but #5 on average, worst path 34.11%
- MT5 mixed field — #1 on wins but #4 on average (+$44.10)
- 0.5% risk — +$30.57, worst path 33.17%
- $300 account — +$25.76, worst path 31.46%
Strong points
- First on wins on 13 of 14 boards
- Plus average on all 14 boards
- Best average on the MT4, trend, grid stress, hybrid and 180-day boards
- 180-day window: 37/100 wins, +$95.92, 79/100 paths in profit
- No account washouts in these tests
Weak points
- Scalper group: #3 on wins, +$18.15 average (TwisterPro +$84.10), 48/100 in profit
- $5000 account: first on wins but #5 on average, with a 34.11% worst path
- Another EA had the better average on 9 of 14 boards
- Worst paths about 24–33% on $1000 boards (deepest at 0.5% risk, 33.17%)
- Listed price is high and outside these tests
Reasons it may fit you
- You want an honest check of a high-priced gold M1 scalper before you spend money or demo time
- You care about wins vs profit — and you want to see both clearly
- You accept gold risk and will try a demo before using real money
Reasons to be careful
- You need the best average on every board, not the most wins
- A 30%+ worst path is too deep for you
- You only trust live Myfxbook / broker results
Our take
It has clear limits too. Against other gold scalpers it was only #3 on wins with a small average, other EAs had the better average on nine boards, and worst paths still reached about a third of the account. It also has a high list price and uses selective grid management.
Our take: Balanced — solid in several areas, with clear limits. The test record is strong, but demo first with small lots and keep the daily drawdown limits on. Downloads stay on MetaTrader Market.
Every EA in a test uses the same FX EA Tester rules. We show results even when this EA is not first. These are research tests — not live trading. Read the risk disclosure.
Other strong gold EAs to consider
No EA won every test. If Scalping Robot Pro MT5 is not the right fit — or you want a second option — start here.
When: You want the EA that beat Scalping Robot Pro on the scalper group board
TwisterPro Scalper has a full research page, led the scalper group (+$84.10), and had the best average on the MT5 (+$58.30) and 0.5% risk (+$43.26) boards.
When: You want another gold scalper with plus averages across many boards
Adaptive Gold Scalper MT5 has its own full research page and averaged plus on all 14 of its boards.
When: You are comparing paid gold EAs with strong averages
The Gold Reaper MT5 has a full research page and averaged plus on all 14 of its boards.
When: You want another researched gold scalper option on this site
Orion Gold Scalper has a full locked-test review with peer boards and a balanced take.
What the run looked like
Screens from FX EA Tester while the tests ran — real test progress, not ad images.
Scalping Robot Pro MT5 mixed gold @ 180-day window
Scalping Robot Pro MT5 vs gold trend field
Scalping Robot Pro MT5 mixed gold @ large account $5000
FAQ
Is Scalping Robot Pro MT5 only for gold?
Yes. The product is optimized exclusively for XAUUSD on the M1 timeframe.
Is it a pure one-trade scalper?
It is sold as M1 gold scalping with selective grid-based trade management and many filters. Demo carefully — grids can still grow exposure.
It led most boards — is that a buy signal?
Not on its own. It finished first on wins on 13 of 14 boards and averaged plus on all 14 over 90 days. But another EA had the better average on 9 boards, worst paths still reached about 24–34%, and these are simulated tests, not live results.
Is Scalping Robot Pro MT5 worth trying at this list price?
It was the strongest EA across our gold boards on wins, and it was plus everywhere, so a careful demo makes sense if the price fits your budget. Be more careful if you need the best average on every board, or if a 30%+ worst path is too deep for you.
Which gold EAs looked stronger on averages?
TwisterPro Scalper had the best average on the MT5, scalper group and 0.5% risk boards. Adaptive Gold Scalper MT5 and The Gold Reaper MT5 averaged plus on all 14 of their own boards. All have full research pages.
Where was it weakest?
Against the scalper group: #3 on wins (22/100, tied) with a +$18.15 average, well behind TwisterPro Scalper (+$84.10), and only 48/100 paths in profit. On the $5000 account it led on wins but was #5 on average (+$117.47).
How risky was drawdown?
Average max drawdown was about 9.3–11.0%. The worst path in a test still reached about 24–33% on $1000 boards, 31% on $300 and 34% on $5000.
Did it face 100 gold EAs at once?
14 gold boards, 63 unique other EAs, 10 per board. Not 100 at once.
Do you have live results here?
No. These are FX EA Tester gold boards only — not live trading results.
What to do next
1) Note 13/14 win leads and 14/14 plus averages — and the deep worst paths.
2) Compare TwisterPro Scalper or Adaptive if you care most about the best average.
3) ZIP if you want ranks.
4) Demo from the download with a small lot before any live use.
More gold EAs with experiments
Research test results are not live trading performance. Orion publishes honest test-based reviews so you can check setup, profit, and risk before you try an EA — not financial advice. Official downloads stay on MetaTrader Market. Read the risk disclosure.