MT5 breakout EA · multi-market · gold tested
Range Breakout EA Download — Session Breakout, No Grid
Range Breakout EA with Range Filters is a MetaTrader 5 session-breakout EA: it trades the move out of the quiet Asian range into London, with built-in filters and Low / Medium / High risk. The listing says no grid and no martingale. In independent 90-day XAUUSD tests against other gold EAs it averaged positive on 11 of 14 boards, never led wins, and lost money on average on three boards.
What is Range Breakout EA with Range Filters?
The idea is simple session behaviour: a tight range in the Asian session, then a breakout when London opens. The EA takes that breakout and aims to close later when volatility slows. The listing says it does not use indicators or a fixed chart timeframe, and it claims no martingale and no grid. Built-in markets are XAUUSD, USDJPY, BTCUSD, US30 and DE40, with one-chart multi-market mode or separate charts per market.
This page’s independent tests check gold (XAUUSD) only under FX EA Tester rules — the results are below.
- 5 built-in markets
- No grid per the listing
- 3 risk levels: Low / Medium / High
- 11/14 gold boards with plus average
How Range Breakout EA trades
One Chart Setup (default) can trade all enabled markets from a single chart. For live use, the seller recommends Individual Chart Setup so you can see the range and breakouts on each market. Risk is Low / Medium / High, or a manual risk % / fixed lot. Extra tools named on the listing: daily drawdown protector, trade randomizer, and a spread filter.
Broker server time should be about GMT+2 / GMT+3 (US trading time).
What you can set
You can also set manual risk %, fixed lot, magic number, trade comment, range colour, and the on-chart daily profit / drawdown display. Custom set files are not required for the built-in markets.
Only XAUUSD is tested on this page. USDJPY, BTCUSD, US30 and DE40 are outside these boards.
Broker presets
- MT5 only — attach on any timeframe
- Risk: Low / Medium / High (start Low)
- One Chart Setup for demo portfolio view
- Individual charts recommended for live
- Broker time about GMT+2 / GMT+3
Specs
- Platform
- MT5 only
- Markets
- XAUUSD, USDJPY, BTCUSD, US30, DE40 (only gold tested here)
- Timeframe
- Any chart (listing: timeframe does not matter)
- Price
- $649 to buy (7 Oct 2026); listing says next $749, final $999
- Developer
- Jimmy Peter Eriksson
- Version
- 5.20 (updated 23 Aug 2026; published 25 Aug 2024)
- Strategy
- Asian range → London breakout with internal filter
- Grid / martingale
- Not used, per the listing
- Risk
- Low / Medium / High; manual risk % or fixed lot
- Activations
- 10
Requirements
- MetaTrader 5
- A broker near GMT+2 / GMT+3 server time
- Access to the markets you enable (gold tests used XAUUSD only)
- Start on Low risk on demo before Medium / High
A good fit if you
- want a session breakout EA with a clear no-grid claim
- like multi-market presets without hunting set files
- trade prop-style accounts and want a daily drawdown protector
- want an independent gold check before paying $649
Not a fit if you need
- an EA that led these gold boards — it never finished first here
- positive averages on every gold mix — three boards averaged negative
- MT4 — this product is MT5 only
- live signal / FTMO proof copied onto this page
Key risks and how to reduce them
What can go wrong
- False breakouts are common; the listing itself warns that drawdowns happen.
- High risk and multi-market One Chart mode can stack exposure across symbols.
- Price is set to rise ($749 / $999) as copies sell — check the live figure.
- Gold-only tests here do not prove BTC, US30 or DE40 results.
Safer first steps
- Demo on your broker for several weeks.
- Start on Low risk; try Individual Chart Setup on XAUUSD first.
- Confirm broker server time is near GMT+2 / GMT+3.
- Set your own daily and overall loss limits before going live.
What to know before you download
- Confirm MT5 and the $649 live price (listing says it will rise).
- Decide One Chart vs Individual Chart Setup.
- Start on Low risk with the daily drawdown protector on.
- Know the model: session range breakout, no grid/martingale per the listing.
- Gold tests were mixed — read them before you buy.
Independent gold tests
- Coverage: 14 tests · 71 other gold EAs · 100 paths each · 90 days (one 180-day board)
- Profit: positive average on 11 of 14 boards; on $1000 from −$19.94 (mixed) to +$36.63 (trend field)
- Wins: never first; best finishes #2 on trend and #3 on scalpers / high-risk / $5000
- Never the best average; weakest averages on mixed, MT4 and scalper-field boards
- Usual drawdown about 8.4–11.3%; worst paths about 17–34%
Did it make money on average?
Mixed — made money on average in 11 of 14 tests
We ran 14 separate gold tests (different peer mixes and account settings). Each line below is one test’s average dollar result — not wins.
One more catch: wins ≠ profit
On the Range Breakout EA with Range Filters vs gold scalper peers test it finished first most often — and still lost money on average.
Full boards, method, and rankings are in the test section below.
Download Range Breakout EA with Range Filters
Version 5.20. MT5 only. Attach on any chart, pick a risk level, and choose One Chart or Individual Chart Setup. Demo first — gold results below are an independent XAUUSD check, not live multi-market proof.
How to install
- Install on MetaTrader 5 and run it on demo first.
- Attach the EA; timeframe does not matter per the listing.
- Choose Low risk to start; confirm GMT+2 / GMT+3 broker time.
- Use Individual Chart Setup on XAUUSD if you want to see the range drawn.
Listing checked 7 Oct 2026. Price can change.
Other options to compare
Compare when: you want a free MT4 gold EA instead of a paid MT5 product
Orion uses stop-based risk and can be downloaded from this site.
Test results for Range Breakout EA with Range Filters
- 14 tests
- 71 other EAs
- 100 paths each
Results breakdown
• Profit: positive average on 11 of 14 tests. On $1000 boards from −$19.94 (mixed) to +$36.63 (trend); +$6.15 on $300 and +$85.62 on $5000.
• Wins: never first. Best finishes #2 on trend and #3 on scalpers, high-risk and $5000.
• Averages: never the best on a board. Negative on mixed, MT4 and scalper-field.
• Drawdown: average max drawdown about 8.4–11.3%. Worst paths about 17–34% on $1000, 27.31% on $300 and 17.28% on $5000. 41–60 of 100 paths ended in profit, with no washouts.
• Bottom line: path-dependent — better next to trend peers, weaker on popular and crowded scalper mixes.
See Where it looked stronger or weaker below for the condition-by-condition read.
How often did paths make money?
60 / 100 best · Range Breakout EA with Range Filters gold @ 2% risk
Each bar is one test. Height = share of paths that finished in profit — not the same as average $.
Where did it finish on wins?
#2 best finish · Range Breakout EA with Range Filters vs gold trend peers (14 firsts)
Shorter bar = better win rank. First on wins can still lose money on average.
How the tests work
Gold (XAUUSD) boards only. Range Breakout EA with Range Filters ran with nine other EAs per board, on the same deposit, lot and risk settings and the same 100 paths over 90 days (180 days on the longer-window board). Across the 14 tests it met 71 other gold EAs.
Conditions covered: mixed popular, MT4, MT5, scalper, trend, AI, hybrid and grid fields, plus 0.5% and 2% risk, $300 and $5000 accounts, and a 180-day window.
- Symbol: XAUUSD
- Paths per test: 100
- Typical window: 90 days · deposit 1000 · lot 0.01 · risk 1%
- Market mix: random (uptrend, downtrend, range, chop, and shock paths)
- Engine: Hosted FX EA Tester (same rules for every EA in a test)
- Coverage: 14 tests · 71 other EAs · 100 paths each
For this EA, averages swing from clear losses to solid gains by peer mix. It never led wins and never had the best average, so use the leaders’ numbers for comparison.
Paths in profit (41–60 of 100) and worst drawdown show how far a single path could go. Path-type notes are FX EA Tester labels.
How to read each test
EAs in the main comparison
Range Breakout EA with Range Filters ran with 9 other EAs in the main test (Range Breakout EA with Range Filters vs mixed gold popular) . Across all tests it faced 71 different other EAs.
Range Breakout EA with Range Filters
Where Range Breakout EA with Range Filters looked stronger
Fit by condition uses FX EA Tester peer groups, not a live product claim.
Looked better in
- Trend peer field — #2 on wins (14/100), +$36.63 (best $1000 average)
- 2% risk — #3 on wins (12/100), +$28.67
- $5000 account — #3 on wins (11/100, tied), +$85.62
- Scalper peer group — #3 on wins (15/100)
- 180-day window — +$15.40, fourth-best average
Looked weaker in
- Mixed popular — −$19.94, #8 on wins (5/100, tied)
- MT4 peer mix — −$9.05, #9 on average
- Scalper field — −$9.10, last on average (#10)
- Never first on wins and never the best average on any board
Results one test at a time
One test at a time — different other EAs and account settings. Look at profit, drawdown, and the short note for each.
Range Breakout EA with Range Filters vs mixed gold popular
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were sideways-wide / strong-uptrend style paths. Average profit was strongest on sideways-wide paths in this board.
Also notable: Scalping Robot Pro led wins (29) with average +$46.80. The Gold Reaper had the best average (+$68.22). Its worst path fell 27.86% and closed at −$256.37.
Range Breakout EA with Range Filters vs gold MT4 field
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were high-volatility-chop paths. Average profit was strongest on sideways-tight paths in this board.
Also notable: Gold Zilla AI led wins (22) with average +$53.77. GOLD Scalper PRO had the best average (+$61.36). Its worst path fell 26.24% and closed at −$245.71.
Range Breakout EA with Range Filters vs gold MT5 field
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were high-volatility-chop / gradual-bear style paths. Average profit was strongest on high-volatility-chop paths in this board.
Also notable: Scalping Robot Pro led wins (23) with average +$45.73. The Gold Reaper had the best average (+$60.74). Its worst path fell 24.04% and closed at −$228.86.
Range Breakout EA with Range Filters vs gold scalpers
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were gradual-bull / high-volatility-chop style paths. Average profit was strongest on gradual-bull paths in this board.
Also notable: TwisterPro Scalper led wins (22) with average +$64.45. AurumEdge Scalper Pro had the best average (+$75.66). Its worst path fell 28.47% and closed at −$204.15.
Range Breakout EA with Range Filters vs gold trend peers
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were sideways-wide / high-volatility-chop style paths. Average profit was strongest on sideways-wide paths in this board.
Also notable: Gold Vanguard EA led wins (23) with average +$90.86. Its worst path fell 34.30% and closed at −$303.64 — its deepest in this set.
Range Breakout EA with Range Filters vs gold scalper field
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were gradual-bear / sideways-wide style paths. Average profit was strongest on strong-downtrend paths in this board.
Also notable: AurumEdge Scalper Pro led wins (22) with average +$73.82. Golden Goose Scalper AI had the best average (+$82.25). Its worst path fell 19.20% and closed at −$182.56.
Range Breakout EA with Range Filters vs gold grid / recovery stress
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were high-volatility-chop / strong-downtrend style paths. Average profit was strongest on high-volatility-chop paths in this board.
Also notable: Lizard led wins (18) with average +$83.47. Gold Vanguard EA had the best average (+$83.96). Its worst path fell 22.16% and closed at −$158.20.
Range Breakout EA with Range Filters vs gold AI peers
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were gradual-bear paths. Average profit was strongest on sideways-wide paths in this board.
Also notable: Aurum AI led wins (27) with average +$66.67. Gold Zilla AI had the best average (+$69.91). Its worst path fell 24.47% and closed at −$234.96.
Range Breakout EA with Range Filters vs gold hybrid peers
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were sideways-tight / gradual-bear style paths. Average profit was strongest on news-shock paths in this board.
Also notable: Sharkyra Gold led wins (20) with average +$73.28. Its worst path fell 25.23% and closed at −$165.83.
Range Breakout EA with Range Filters gold @ 0.5% risk
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were gradual-bull / sideways-wide style paths. Average profit was strongest on news-shock paths in this board.
Also notable: Smart Gold Hunter led wins (18) with average +$33.00. Its worst path fell 20.59% and closed at −$198.12.
Range Breakout EA with Range Filters gold @ 2% risk
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were news-shock / strong-downtrend style paths. Average profit was strongest on strong-downtrend paths in this board.
Also notable: Prisma led wins (28) with average +$70.51. Its worst path fell 21.71% and closed at −$175.16.
Range Breakout EA with Range Filters gold @ $300 deposit
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were gradual-bull paths. Average profit was strongest on low-volatility-quiet paths in this board.
Also notable: Byrdi led wins (20) with average +$15.65. TwisterPro Scalper had the best average (+$28.47). On a $300.00 deposit, +$6.15 is about +2.1%. Its worst path fell 27.31% and closed at −$71.55.
Range Breakout EA with Range Filters gold @ $5000 deposit
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were gradual-bull / high-volatility-chop style paths. Average profit was strongest on news-shock paths in this board.
Also notable: Sharkyra Gold led wins (13) with average +$52.13. Trend Catcher exp had the best average (+$110.46). On a $5,000.00 deposit, +$85.62 is about +1.7%. Its worst path fell 17.28% and closed at −$861.52.
Range Breakout EA with Range Filters mixed gold @ 180-day window
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were news-shock paths. Average profit was strongest on strong-downtrend paths in this board.
Also notable: Gold Zilla AI led wins (32) with average +$74.70. Its worst path fell 20.59% and closed at −$182.07.
Full ranking for the main test
Full results for Range Breakout EA with Range Filters vs mixed gold popular. Wins mean finished first on a path — not the same as “always made profit.”
| Rank | EA | Wins | Avg profit | Avg return | Avg DD | Worst DD | Washouts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
29 | $46.80 | 4.68% | 10.32% | 29.56% | 0 |
| 2 |
|
17 | $52.72 | 5.27% | 8.10% | 22.79% | 0 |
| 3 |
|
16 | $68.22 | 6.82% | 9.58% | 56.90% | 0 |
| 4 |
|
9 | $34.79 | 3.48% | 8.80% | 21.22% | 0 |
| 5 |
|
7 | $21.72 | 2.17% | 10.20% | 23.73% | 0 |
| 6 |
|
6 | $48.65 | 4.87% | 7.75% | 18.93% | 0 |
| 7 |
|
5 | -$11.64 | -1.16% | 10.06% | 25.43% | 0 |
| 8 |
|
5 | -$19.94 | -1.99% | 11.25% | 27.86% | 0 |
| 9 |
|
5 | -$25.36 | -2.54% | 10.85% | 22.80% | 0 |
| 10 |
|
1 | -$30.31 | -3.03% | 10.92% | 25.90% | 0 |
Related on Orion: gold EA store · risk disclosure · backtesting limits
So… is Range Breakout EA with Range Filters worth trying?
Where it looked stronger or weaker
Fit by condition uses FX EA Tester peer groups, not a live product claim.
Better in these test mixes
- Trend peer field — #2 on wins (14/100), +$36.63 (best $1000 average)
- 2% risk — #3 on wins (12/100), +$28.67
- $5000 account — #3 on wins (11/100, tied), +$85.62
- Scalper peer group — #3 on wins (15/100)
- 180-day window — +$15.40, fourth-best average
Weaker in these test mixes
- Mixed popular — −$19.94, #8 on wins (5/100, tied)
- MT4 peer mix — −$9.05, #9 on average
- Scalper field — −$9.10, last on average (#10)
- Never first on wins and never the best average on any board
Strong points
- Positive average on 11 of 14 boards, no washouts
- #2 on wins in the trend field (+$36.63)
- Top-three wins on scalpers, high-risk and $5000
- Listing: no grid / no martingale; plug-and-play markets
- Daily drawdown protector and risk levels on the listing
Weak points
- Never first on wins; never the best average
- Negative on mixed (−$19.94), MT4 (−$9.05) and scalper-field (−$9.10)
- Only 41–60 of 100 paths in profit
- Worst path reached about 34% on the trend board
- High purchase price vs mixed gold-test results
Reasons it may fit you
- You want a session-breakout EA and accept mixed gold-test results
- You will start on Low risk and demo Individual Chart Setup
- You trade more than gold and treat these boards as a gold-only check
Reasons to be careful
- You want an EA that led these gold boards
- You need positive averages on every peer mix
- You only trust live Myfxbook / FTMO statements
Our take
In these 90-day gold tests results varied by peer mix: plus averages on 11 of 14 boards and a strong trend-field finish, but never first on wins, never the best average, and average losses on the mixed, MT4 and scalper-field boards.
Our take: Mixed — results vary by market path. The product story is clear; the gold tests do not show it beating the leaders. Demo first and compare the EAs below. Downloads stay on MetaTrader Market.
Every EA in a test uses the same FX EA Tester rules. We show results even when this EA is not first. These are research tests — not live trading. Read the risk disclosure.
Other strong gold EAs to consider
No EA won every test. If Range Breakout EA with Range Filters is not the right fit — or you want a second option — start here.
When: You want the EA that led the mixed and MT5 boards
Scalping Robot Pro has a full research page and led the mixed popular board (29/100) and the MT5 board on wins.
When: You want the EA that led the trend board
Gold Vanguard has a full research page and led the trend board on wins and average (+$90.86).
When: You want the EA that led the scalper group
TwisterPro has a full research page and led the scalper board on wins (22/100).
What the run looked like
Screens from FX EA Tester while the tests ran — real test progress, not ad images.
Range Breakout EA with Range Filters vs gold trend peers
Range Breakout EA with Range Filters gold @ 2% risk
FAQ
Where do I download Range Breakout EA with Range Filters?
The Download link on this page goes to the official MetaTrader 5 product. There is no MT4 edition. Demo first before any live use.
Is this the same as other EAs named Range Breakout EA?
No. Several Market products share similar names. This page covers only Range Breakout EA with Range Filters by Jimmy Peter Eriksson (product 122237).
How much does it cost?
On 7 Oct 2026 the Market price was $649. The listing says the next price is $749 and the final price is $999, so check the download page.
Does it use a grid or martingale?
The listing says no martingale and no grid. It describes a session-range breakout with filters and risk levels. Confirm trade count on your own demo.
What does it need to run?
MetaTrader 5, a broker near GMT+2 / GMT+3, and the markets you enable. Attach on any timeframe, pick Low / Medium / High risk, and choose One Chart or Individual Chart Setup.
How did it do in the gold tests?
Mixed. It averaged positive on 11 of 14 boards over 90 days, but never finished first on wins, never had the best average, and averaged negative on the mixed, MT4 and scalper-field boards.
Where did it do best?
In the trend peer field it was #2 on wins (14/100) with +$36.63. It was also #3 on wins among scalpers, at 2% risk, and on the $5000 account.
How deep was the drawdown?
Average max drawdown stayed between about 8.4% and 11.3%. Worst paths reached about 17–34% on $1000 boards, 27.31% on $300 and 17.28% on $5000.
Is it worth $649?
The no-grid session story is clear, but these gold boards were path-dependent and often behind the leaders. Compare Scalping Robot Pro and Gold Vanguard first, and demo on Low risk if you still like the setup.
Did it face 100 gold EAs at once?
No. 14 gold boards, 71 unique other EAs, 10 per board.
Are these live trading results?
No. These are FX EA Tester gold boards, not live trading results. Marketplace reviews, live signals and FTMO links are not checked here.
What to do next
1) Note the main finding: positive on 11 of 14 boards, negative on three, never first.
2) Compare Scalping Robot Pro MT5 and Gold Vanguard EA below.
3) ZIP downloads are optional rank files.
4) If you try it, demo on Low risk with Individual Chart Setup on XAUUSD first.
More gold EAs with experiments
Research test results are not live trading performance. Orion publishes honest test-based reviews so you can check setup, profit, and risk before you try an EA — not financial advice. Official downloads stay on MetaTrader Market. Read the risk disclosure.