MT5 gold EA · XAUUSD · prop-style daily loss limit
Prop Firm Gold EA Download — Intraday Gold Breakout for MT5
Prop Firm Gold EA is a MetaTrader 5 gold EA for XAUUSD: several intraday breakout and price-pattern logics, Low / Medium / High risk, and a listing claim of no martingale and no grid. In independent 90-day XAUUSD tests against other gold EAs it averaged negative on all 14 boards and never finished first.
What is Prop Firm Gold EA?
It is built for XAUUSD on MetaTrader 5. The listing describes several intraday breakout and price-pattern logics, not a single indicator setup and not a fixed chart timeframe. Risk is Low / Medium / High, or a manual risk % / fixed lot. The page headline says no martingale and no grid. Prop-style tools include a daily drawdown protector, a trade randomizer, FIFO mode, and an entry delay.
To see how it held up next to other gold EAs, we ran it through 14 FX EA Tester gold tests with the same rules for every EA — the results are on this page.
- No grid per the listing
- 3 risk levels: Low / Medium / High
- GMT+2 broker time the listing expects
- 0/14 gold boards with plus average
How Prop Firm Gold EA trades
For prop-style accounts, turn on the daily drawdown protector and set the intraday loss % that closes open trades. Extra inputs named on the listing: trade randomizer, FIFO mode, first-trade delay, magic number, trade comment, manual risk %, and fixed lot.
Broker server time should be about GMT+2 / GMT+3. The no-grid claim is part of the product story — confirm trade count on your own demo.
What you can set
You can also switch to manual risk % or a fixed lot, turn FIFO mode on, and delay the first entry if your firm opens the market later.
Only gold is in scope on the listing. These boards test XAUUSD only.
Broker presets
- MT5 only — XAUUSD
- Risk: Low / Medium / High (start Low)
- Daily drawdown protector on for prop-style accounts
- Broker time about GMT+2 / GMT+3
- Unique magic number and trade comment
Specs
- Platform
- MT5 only
- Pair
- XAUUSD (Gold)
- Timeframe
- Not fixed on the listing (seller guide often uses M30)
- Price
- $499 to buy (8 Oct 2026); listing says final price $999
- Developer
- Jimmy Peter Eriksson
- Version
- 2.5 (published 29 Oct 2025)
- Strategy
- Intraday breakout and price patterns
- Grid / martingale
- Not used, per the listing
- Risk
- Low / Medium / High; manual risk % or fixed lot
- Prop tools
- Daily drawdown protector, trade randomizer, FIFO, entry delay
Requirements
- MetaTrader 5
- XAUUSD
- A broker near GMT+2 / GMT+3 server time
- Start on Low risk on demo before Medium / High
- If you use a prop-style account, set the daily loss % yourself
A good fit if you
- want a gold breakout EA with a clear no-grid claim
- trade prop-style accounts and want a daily drawdown protector
- like Low / Medium / High risk instead of heavy set-file tuning
- want an independent gold check before paying about $499
Not a fit if you need
- an EA that averaged positive on these gold boards — none of the 14 did
- an EA that led these boards — it never finished first
- MT4 — this product is MT5 only
- live signal or FTMO screenshots treated as proof on this page
Key risks and how to reduce them
What can go wrong
- Breakouts fail often; a no-grid claim does not remove losing streaks.
- Medium and High risk can deepen drawdown even with a daily loss cap.
- Wrong broker time (not near GMT+2 / GMT+3) can shift session logic.
- The list price is set to rise toward $999 — check the live figure.
Safer first steps
- Demo on your broker for several weeks.
- Start on Low risk with the daily drawdown protector on.
- Confirm broker server time is near GMT+2 / GMT+3.
- Set your own daily and overall loss limits before going live.
What to know before you download
- Confirm MT5 and the $499 live price (listing says final $999).
- Start on Low risk with a daily loss limit if you need one.
- Know the model: intraday breakout, no grid/martingale per the listing.
- Gold tests were weak — read them before you buy.
Independent gold tests
- Coverage: 14 tests · 71 other gold EAs · 100 paths each · 90 days (one 180-day board)
- Profit: negative average on all 14 boards; on $1000 from −$12.39 (0.5% risk) to −$57.49 (180-day)
- Wins: never first; last on 5 boards, including the $300 account (0/100)
- Least negative averages on the $5000 board (−$11.95) and at 0.5% risk (−$12.39)
- Usual drawdown about 8.8–14.8%; worst paths about 23–32% on $1000, 38.48% on $300
Did it make money on average?
No — it lost money on average in every test
We ran 14 separate gold tests (different peer mixes and account settings). Each line below is one test’s average dollar result — not wins.
One more catch: wins ≠ profit
On the Prop Firm Gold EA vs gold scalpers test it finished first most often — and still lost money on average.
Full boards, method, and rankings are in the test section below.
Download Prop Firm Gold EA
Version 2.5. MT5 only. Attach on XAUUSD, pick a risk level, and demo first — gold results below are an independent XAUUSD check, not live or FTMO proof.
How to install
- Install on MetaTrader 5 and run it on demo first.
- Attach on XAUUSD; confirm GMT+2 / GMT+3 broker time.
- Choose Low risk to start and set a daily drawdown limit if you need one.
- Use your own magic number and trade comment.
Listing checked 8 Oct 2026. Price can change.
Other options to compare
Compare when: you want another breakout EA from the same developer
Range Breakout EA has its own gold research page and a session-range design.
Compare when: you want a free MT4 gold EA instead of a paid MT5 product
Orion uses stop-based risk and can be downloaded from this site.
Test results for Prop Firm Gold EA
- 14 tests
- 71 other EAs
- 100 paths each
Results breakdown
• Profit: negative average on all 14 tests. On $1000 boards from −$12.39 (0.5% risk) to −$57.49 (180-day); −$24.20 on $300 and −$11.95 on $5000.
• Wins: never first. Last on 5 boards. Best win ranks were mid-pack (#5–#6) on scalpers and the mixed board.
• Averages: never the best, and last on average on several boards including scalpers, scalper-field, 0.5% risk, $300 and $5000.
• Drawdown: average max drawdown about 8.8–14.8%. Worst paths about 23–32% on $1000, 38.48% on $300 and 25.42% on $5000. 28–49 of 100 paths ended in profit, with no washouts.
• Bottom line: weak across these locked gold mixes — compare stronger EAs below before you pay.
See Where it looked stronger or weaker below for the condition-by-condition read.
How often did paths make money?
49 / 100 best · Prop Firm Gold EA vs mixed gold popular
Each bar is one test. Height = share of paths that finished in profit — not the same as average $.
Where did it finish on wins?
#5 best finish · Prop Firm Gold EA vs gold scalpers (8 firsts)
Shorter bar = better win rank. First on wins can still lose money on average.
How the tests work
Gold (XAUUSD) boards only. Prop Firm Gold EA ran with nine other EAs per board, on the same deposit, lot and risk settings and the same 100 paths over 90 days (180 days on the longer-window board). Across the 14 tests it met 71 other gold EAs.
Conditions covered: mixed popular, MT4, MT5, scalper, trend, AI, hybrid and grid fields, plus 0.5% and 2% risk, $300 and $5000 accounts, and a 180-day window.
- Symbol: XAUUSD
- Paths per test: 100
- Typical window: 90 days · deposit 1000 · lot 0.01 · risk 1%
- Market mix: random (uptrend, downtrend, range, chop, and shock paths)
- Engine: Hosted FX EA Tester (same rules for every EA in a test)
- Coverage: 14 tests · 71 other EAs · 100 paths each
For this EA, every board average was negative. Use the leaders’ numbers for comparison.
Paths in profit (28–49 of 100) and worst drawdown show how far a single path could go. Path-type notes are FX EA Tester labels.
How to read each test
EAs in the main comparison
Prop Firm Gold EA ran with 9 other EAs in the main test (Prop Firm Gold EA vs mixed gold popular) . Across all tests it faced 71 different other EAs.
Prop Firm Gold EA
Where Prop Firm Gold EA looked stronger
Fit by condition uses FX EA Tester peer groups, not a live product claim.
Looked better in
- $5000 account — least-negative average (−$11.95), still last on average
- 0.5% risk — −$12.39, second-least negative, but last on wins
- Scalper field — mildest $1000 loss among style boards (−$17.63)
Looked weaker in
- Negative average on all 14 boards; never first on wins
- 180-day window — −$57.49, last on wins (0/100)
- 2% risk — −$53.61
- $300 account — last on wins (0/100) and last on average (−$24.20)
- Last on wins on grid, hybrid, 0.5% risk, $300 and 180-day boards
Results one test at a time
One test at a time — different other EAs and account settings. Look at profit, drawdown, and the short note for each.
Prop Firm Gold EA vs mixed gold popular
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were gradual-bull / sideways-tight style paths. Average profit was strongest on gradual-bear paths in this board.
Also notable: Scalping Robot Pro led wins (32) with average +$75.41. Its worst path fell 27.78% and closed at −$274.16.
Prop Firm Gold EA vs gold MT4 field
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were strong-downtrend paths. Average profit was strongest on news-shock paths in this board.
Also notable: Scalping Robot Pro led wins (29) with average +$68.42. The Gold Reaper had the best average (+$69.07). Its worst path fell 23.98% and closed at −$231.70.
Prop Firm Gold EA vs gold MT5 field
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were news-shock / strong-downtrend style paths. Average profit was strongest on news-shock paths in this board.
Also notable: Scalping Robot Pro led wins (27) with average +$58.78. TwisterPro Scalper had the best average (+$60.42). Its worst path fell 24.58% and closed at −$245.18.
Prop Firm Gold EA vs gold scalpers
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were gradual-bull paths.
Also notable: AurumEdge Scalper Pro led wins (28) with average +$78.10. Its worst path fell 31.57% and closed at −$310.90.
Prop Firm Gold EA vs gold trend peers
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were sideways-wide paths. Average profit was strongest on strong-uptrend paths in this board.
Also notable: Gold Vanguard EA led wins (27) with average +$101.41. Its worst path fell 26.01% and closed at −$215.12.
Prop Firm Gold EA vs gold scalper field
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were news-shock / strong-downtrend style paths. Average profit was strongest on strong-uptrend paths in this board.
Also notable: Golden Goose Scalper AI led wins (25) with average +$80.78. Adaptive Gold Scalper had the best average (+$96.03). Its worst path fell 22.93% and closed at −$227.25.
Prop Firm Gold EA vs gold grid / recovery stress
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were high-volatility-chop / sideways-tight style paths. Average profit was strongest on high-volatility-chop paths in this board.
Also notable: Vex Gold EA led wins (18) with average +$49.78. Gold Vanguard EA had the best average (+$92.29). Its worst path fell 25.83% and closed at −$230.44.
Prop Firm Gold EA vs gold AI peers
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were gradual-bear paths. Average profit was strongest on sideways-wide paths in this board.
Also notable: Gold Zilla AI led wins (18) with average +$42.45. Its worst path fell 22.73% and closed at −$215.29.
Prop Firm Gold EA vs gold hybrid peers
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were gradual-bull / high-volatility-chop style paths.
Also notable: XG Gold Robot led wins (18) with average +$54.06. Its worst path fell 26.06% and closed at −$259.16.
Prop Firm Gold EA gold @ 0.5% risk
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were high-volatility-chop paths. Average profit was strongest on high-volatility-chop paths in this board.
Also notable: CRT Model 1 led wins (16) with average +$11.98. TwisterPro Scalper had the best average (+$44.28). Its worst path fell 25.78% and closed at −$223.12.
Prop Firm Gold EA gold @ 2% risk
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were sideways-tight paths. Average profit was strongest on news-shock paths in this board.
Also notable: Gold Zilla AI led wins (32) with average +$88.12. Its worst path fell 28.40% and closed at −$271.63.
Prop Firm Gold EA gold @ $300 deposit
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: No first-place paths on this board, so path-type wins are not listed.
Also notable: GoldSpire led wins (20) with average +$9.36. TwisterPro Scalper had the best average (+$31.69). On a $300.00 deposit, −$24.20 is about −8.1%. Its worst path fell 38.48% and closed at −$101.17 — its deepest in this set.
Prop Firm Gold EA gold @ $5000 deposit
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were strong-uptrend paths. Average profit was strongest on gradual-bull paths in this board.
Also notable: Smart Gold Impulse led wins (16) with average +$84.54. Aureum Quant had the best average (+$101.40). On a $5,000.00 deposit, −$11.95 is about −0.2%. Its worst path fell 25.42% and closed at −$1,266.89.
Prop Firm Gold EA mixed gold @ 180-day window
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: No first-place paths on this board, so path-type wins are not listed.
Also notable: Gold Zilla AI led wins (38) with average +$82.46. Its worst path fell 25.75% and closed at −$249.24.
Full ranking for the main test
Full results for Prop Firm Gold EA vs mixed gold popular. Wins mean finished first on a path — not the same as “always made profit.”
| Rank | EA | Wins | Avg profit | Avg return | Avg DD | Worst DD | Washouts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
32 | $75.41 | 7.54% | 9.58% | 25.30% | 0 |
| 2 |
|
19 | $61.36 | 6.14% | 8.77% | 21.15% | 0 |
| 3 |
|
11 | $41.98 | 4.20% | 8.29% | 22.13% | 0 |
| 4 |
|
11 | $25.05 | 2.51% | 9.09% | 21.64% | 0 |
| 5 |
|
8 | $64.77 | 6.48% | 7.49% | 13.44% | 0 |
| 6 |
|
7 | -$29.32 | -2.93% | 11.21% | 27.78% | 0 |
| 7 |
|
5 | $1.77 | 0.18% | 10.56% | 23.38% | 0 |
| 8 |
|
4 | $4.33 | 0.43% | 10.02% | 30.53% | 0 |
| 9 |
|
2 | -$30.36 | -3.04% | 10.74% | 27.05% | 0 |
| 10 |
|
1 | -$53.03 | -5.30% | 11.93% | 25.62% | 0 |
Related on Orion: gold EA store · risk disclosure · backtesting limits
So… is Prop Firm Gold EA worth trying?
Where it looked stronger or weaker
Fit by condition uses FX EA Tester peer groups, not a live product claim.
Better in these test mixes
- $5000 account — least-negative average (−$11.95), still last on average
- 0.5% risk — −$12.39, second-least negative, but last on wins
- Scalper field — mildest $1000 loss among style boards (−$17.63)
Weaker in these test mixes
- Negative average on all 14 boards; never first on wins
- 180-day window — −$57.49, last on wins (0/100)
- 2% risk — −$53.61
- $300 account — last on wins (0/100) and last on average (−$24.20)
- Last on wins on grid, hybrid, 0.5% risk, $300 and 180-day boards
Strong points
- No account washouts across these boards
- Least-negative averages on the $5000 board and at 0.5% risk
- Listing: no grid / no martingale; Low / Medium / High risk
- Daily drawdown protector and trade randomizer on the listing
- Clear MT5 / XAUUSD product scope
Weak points
- Negative average on all 14 boards
- Never first on wins; last on 5 boards
- Deepest average loss on the 180-day board (−$57.49)
- Only 28–49 of 100 paths in profit
- Worst path reached 38.48% on the $300 board
Reasons it may fit you
- You still want the no-grid breakout design after reading weak gold tests
- You will demo on Low risk with a daily loss limit
- You treat live signals and FTMO links as marketing, not proof
Reasons to be careful
- You want an EA that averaged positive on these gold boards
- You need it to finish near the top of a peer mix
- You only trust live Myfxbook statements
Our take
In these 90-day gold tests results were weak: a negative average on every board, no first-place wins finish, and last place on wins on five boards. The least negative averages were still losses, on the $5000 account and at 0.5% risk.
Our take: Cautious — weaker results in these tests. The product tools are clear; the gold tests do not support paying for peer-leading performance. Demo only if you still want the setup, and compare the EAs below. Downloads stay on MetaTrader Market.
Every EA in a test uses the same FX EA Tester rules. We show results even when this EA is not first. These are research tests — not live trading. Read the risk disclosure.
Other strong gold EAs to consider
No EA won every test. If Prop Firm Gold EA is not the right fit — or you want a second option — start here.
When: You want the EA that led the mixed board
Scalping Robot Pro has a full research page and led the mixed board on wins and average (+$75.41).
When: You want a gold breakout EA with stronger boards
The Gold Reaper has a full research page and had the best average on the MT4 board next to this EA (+$69.07).
When: You want the EA that led the trend board
Gold Vanguard has a full research page and led the trend board on wins and average (+$101.41).
When: You want another breakout EA from the same developer
Range Breakout EA has a full research page for a session-range design.
What the run looked like
Screens from FX EA Tester while the tests ran — real test progress, not ad images.
Prop Firm Gold EA gold @ 0.5% risk
Prop Firm Gold EA gold @ $5000 deposit
FAQ
Where do I download Prop Firm Gold EA?
The Download link on this page goes to the official MetaTrader 5 product. There is no MT4 edition. Demo first before any live use.
Is this the same as Prop Firm Gold Guardian or Range Breakout EA?
No. Prop Firm Gold Guardian and Prop Firm Gold King are different products. Range Breakout EA with Range Filters is another EA from the same developer. This page covers only Prop Firm Gold EA (product 153540).
How much does it cost?
On 8 Oct 2026 the Market price was $499. The listing says the final price is $999, so check the download page.
Does it use a grid or martingale?
The listing says no martingale and no grid. It describes intraday breakout and price-pattern logic with risk levels. Confirm trade count on your own demo.
What does it need to run?
MetaTrader 5, XAUUSD, and a broker near GMT+2 / GMT+3. Pick Low / Medium / High risk. For prop-style use, set the daily drawdown protector to your firm’s daily loss rule.
How did it do in the gold tests?
Weak. It averaged negative on all 14 boards, never finished first on wins, and was last on wins on five boards.
Where did it do least poorly?
On the $5000 account the average was −$11.95. At 0.5% risk it was −$12.39. Both were still last or near last on average.
How deep was the drawdown?
Average max drawdown stayed between about 8.8% and 14.8%. Worst paths reached about 23–32% on $1000 boards, 38.48% on $300 and 25.42% on $5000.
Is it worth $499?
The no-grid and daily-loss tools are clear, but these gold boards were negative across every peer mix. Compare Scalping Robot Pro and The Gold Reaper first, and only demo on Low risk if you still like the setup.
Did it face 100 gold EAs at once?
No. 14 gold boards, 71 unique other EAs, 10 per board.
Are these live trading results?
No. These are FX EA Tester gold boards, not live trading results. Marketplace reviews, live signals and FTMO links are not checked here.
What to do next
1) Note the main finding: negative average on all 14 boards.
2) Compare Scalping Robot Pro MT5 and The Gold Reaper MT5 below.
3) ZIP downloads are optional rank files.
4) If you still try it, demo on Low risk with a daily loss limit first.
More gold EAs with experiments
Research test results are not live trading performance. Orion publishes honest test-based reviews so you can check setup, profit, and risk before you try an EA — not financial advice. Official downloads stay on MetaTrader Market. Read the risk disclosure.