MT5 gold EA · XAUUSD
Quantum iGold MT5 Download — AI Gold EA for MT5
Quantum iGold MT5 is a low-cost MetaTrader 5 gold (XAUUSD) EA that uses an AI model to read price behaviour and sizes trades to current volatility, with its own built-in stop loss and take profit. In independent 90-day XAUUSD tests against other gold EAs it averaged negative on all 14 boards and came last on wins on 10 of them.
What is Quantum iGold MT5?
The product is built around an AI model that combines two types of neural network (LSTM and Transformer). The model looks for volatility clusters, short-term reversal zones and areas where a trend may continue. A risk module then changes position size and exposure to match current volatility.
It is sold as plug-and-play: default settings are ready, and buyers get a setup file, a manual and an install guide from the developer after purchase. To see how it behaves next to other gold EAs, we ran it through 14 FX EA Tester gold tests with the same rules for every EA — the results are on this page.
- $125 list price (30 Sep 2026)
- 4 supported timeframes
- $500 minimum deposit
- 0/14 gold boards with plus average
How Quantum iGold MT5 trades
The AI model reads recent gold price behaviour and looks for three kinds of setup: volatility clusters, short-term reversal zones and trend-continuation areas. When it takes a trade, a dynamic risk module sets the position size from current volatility, so size goes down when gold is moving fast and up when it is calm.
Every trade uses a stop loss and take profit built into the strategy. These internal levels cannot be replaced with your own SL / TP inputs. The listing does not say whether it ever adds positions (grid or martingale), so watch open trades closely on demo.
What you can set
The stop loss and take profit are fixed inside the strategy, so you cannot tighten or widen them. That keeps setup simple, but it also means your main risk control is position size and account balance.
Ask the developer for the setup file after purchase, start with it on demo and change one thing at a time.
Broker presets
- Attach on XAUUSD — M5, M15, H1 or D1
- Start from the default settings or the setup file sent after purchase
- Minimum lot 0.01
- Deposit $500 or more
- Run on a VPS so it stays online 24/5
Specs
- Platform
- MT5 only
- Pair
- XAUUSD (gold)
- Price
- $125 to buy (30 Sep 2026); no rent option shown
- Developer
- Yassine Mouhssine
- Version
- 3.0 (updated 19 Sep 2026)
- Timeframes
- M5, M15, H1, D1
- Strategy
- AI model (LSTM + Transformer) with volatility-based position sizing
- Stops
- Built-in stop loss and take profit; cannot be overridden by external inputs
- Deposit
- Minimum $500; minimum lot 0.01
- Account types
- Raw, ECN, Cent, Micro, Standard or Premium
Requirements
- MetaTrader 5 (no MT4 edition)
- Gold / XAUUSD on M5, M15, H1 or D1
- At least $500 in the account
- A supported account type (Raw, ECN, Cent, Micro, Standard or Premium)
- A VPS if you want it running 24/5
- The setup file and manual from the developer after purchase
A good fit if you
- want a low-cost MT5 gold EA to try instead of a $1,000+ product
- like the idea of an AI model with volatility-based position sizing
- are happy to use built-in stops instead of setting your own
- will demo for a while before any live use
- want an independent check of a popular new gold EA before you spend money
Not a fit if you need
- an MT4 version — it is MT5 only
- control over stop loss and take profit — they are fixed inside the strategy
- positive averages next to other gold EAs — it had none in the 14 tests below
- a small-account EA — its $300 board had a worst path of about 55%
- a live Myfxbook / broker statement copied here as proof
Key risks and how to reduce them
What can go wrong
- The stop loss and take profit cannot be changed, so lot size and balance are your main risk controls.
- The listing does not say whether the EA ever adds positions, so exposure on a fast gold move is not clear before you test it.
- AI and neural-network wording describes the method; it is not proof of profit.
- Setup files and the manual come after purchase, so you cannot check them before you buy.
- Spread, slippage and VPS quality all affect a gold EA that runs 24/5.
Safer first steps
- Demo on the same broker, account type and VPS you plan to use later.
- Start at 0.01 lots or the lowest risk setting.
- Use more than the $500 minimum, or a smaller size on less.
- Do not raise risk after a loss.
- Set your own maximum account-loss limit before any live use.
What to know before you download
- Confirm you use MetaTrader 5 — there is no MT4 version.
- List price was $125 to buy on 30 Sep 2026 — check the live figure.
- Know the model: AI-based entries, volatility-based sizing, fixed internal stops.
- Plan for at least $500 and a VPS.
- Independent 90-day gold tests were negative on average on all 14 boards — read them before you buy.
Independent gold tests
- Coverage: 14 tests · 71 other gold EAs · 100 paths each · 90 days (one 180-day board)
- Profit: negative average on all 14 boards, from −$34.68 (MT5 mix) to −$86.43 (180-day) on $1000
- Wins: never first; last on 10 boards. Best finish was #5 against the scalper group (9/100, tied)
- Lower risk did not fix it: −$39.28 at 0.5% risk, −$64.22 at 2% risk
- Usual drawdown about 8.9–16.9%; worst paths about 25–36% on $1000 and about 55% on $300
Did it make money on average?
No — it lost money on average in every test
We ran 14 separate gold tests (different peer mixes and account settings). Each line below is one test’s average dollar result — not wins.
One more catch: wins ≠ profit
On the Quantum iGold MT5 vs gold scalpers test it finished first most often — and still lost money on average.
Full boards, method, and rankings are in the test section below.
Download Quantum iGold MT5
Version 3.0. MT5 only; no MT4 version. After purchase, message the developer for the setup file and manual. Demo first — gold results below are an independent check on XAUUSD.
How to install
- Install on MetaTrader 5 and run it on demo first.
- After purchase, message the developer for the setup file, manual and install guide.
- Attach the EA to an XAUUSD chart on M5, M15, H1 or D1.
- Start at 0.01 lots, and use a VPS if you leave it running 24/5.
Listing checked 30 Sep 2026. Price can change.
Other options to compare
Compare when: you want a free MT4 gold EA instead of a paid MT5 product
Orion uses stop-based risk and can be downloaded from this site.
Compare when: you want another MT5 gold EA with a fixed stop and take profit on every trade
TwisterPro Scalper has its own full product and research page.
Test results for Quantum iGold MT5
- 14 tests
- 71 other EAs
- 100 paths each
Results breakdown
• Profit: negative average on all 14 tests, from −$34.68 (MT5 mix) to −$86.43 (180-day) on $1000; −$34.19 on $300 and −$53.37 on $5000.
• Wins: never first. Last on wins on 10 boards, with 0 wins on the trend and $300 boards. Its best finish was #5 against the scalper group (9/100, tied).
• Averages: lowest on the board on 11 of 14.
• Risk level: −$39.28 at 0.5% risk and −$64.22 at 2% risk — cutting risk did not turn the result positive.
• Drawdown: average max drawdown about 8.9–16.9%. Worst paths about 25–36% on $1000, 55% on $300 and 26% on $5000. Only 19–50 of 100 paths ended in profit.
• Bottom line: a low price and an AI story did not translate into results next to other gold EAs in these tests.
See Where it looked stronger or weaker below for the condition-by-condition read.
How often did paths make money?
50 / 100 best · Quantum iGold MT5 gold @ $5000 deposit
Each bar is one test. Height = share of paths that finished in profit — not the same as average $.
Where did it finish on wins?
#5 best finish · Quantum iGold MT5 vs gold scalpers (9 firsts)
Shorter bar = better win rank. First on wins can still lose money on average.
How the tests work
Gold (XAUUSD) boards only. Quantum iGold MT5 and nine other EAs per board, with the same deposit, lot and risk settings and the same 100 paths over 90 days (180 days on the longer-window board). Across 14 tests it faced 71 other gold EAs.
The 14 conditions: mixed popular, MT4, MT5, scalper, trend, AI, hybrid and grid fields, plus 0.5% and 2% risk, $300 and $5000 accounts, and a 180-day window. The tests do not use the developer's private setup file, so treat them as a check of the design, not of one set file.
- Symbol: XAUUSD
- Paths per test: 100
- Typical window: 90 days · deposit 1000 · lot 0.01 · risk 1%
- Market mix: random (uptrend, downtrend, range, chop, and shock paths)
- Engine: Hosted FX EA Tester (same rules for every EA in a test)
- Coverage: 14 tests · 71 other EAs · 100 paths each
For this EA, wins and average profit point the same way — it finished at or near the bottom on both on almost every board.
The most useful extra columns are paths in profit (19–50 of 100) and worst drawdown, which was deepest on the $300 account. Path-type notes are FX EA Tester labels.
How to read each test
EAs in the main comparison
Quantum iGold MT5 ran with 9 other EAs in the main test (Quantum iGold MT5 vs mixed gold popular) . Across all tests it faced 71 different other EAs.
Quantum iGold MT5
Where Quantum iGold MT5 looked stronger
Fit by condition uses FX EA Tester peer groups, not a live product claim.
Looked better in
- Scalper group — its best finish: #5 on wins (9/100, tied), −$36.40
- $5000 account — most paths in profit (50/100) and its lowest average drawdown (8.90%), though −$53.37 and last on wins
- MT5 mixed board — its mildest $1000 average (−$34.68), 42/100 in profit
- 0.5% risk — its shallowest worst path (25.41%)
Looked weaker in
- 180-day window — weakest average (−$86.43), 19/100 in profit
- $300 account — last on wins (0/100), 19/100 in profit, worst path 54.55%
- 2% risk — −$64.22, last on wins
- Hybrid peer field — deepest $1000 worst path (36.39%), last on wins
- Trend peer field — 0 wins
Results one test at a time
One test at a time — different other EAs and account settings. Look at profit, drawdown, and the short note for each.
Quantum iGold MT5 vs mixed gold popular
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were news-shock paths. Average profit was strongest on news-shock paths in this board.
Also notable: Scalping Robot Pro led wins (24) with average +$52.47. TwisterPro Scalper had the best average (+$66.29). Its worst path fell 30.51% and closed at −$264.89.
Quantum iGold MT5 vs gold MT4 field
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were strong-downtrend paths. Average profit was strongest on strong-downtrend paths in this board.
Also notable: Scalping Robot Pro led wins (34) with average +$78.35. Its worst path fell 27.87% and closed at −$264.94.
Quantum iGold MT5 vs gold MT5 field
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were strong-downtrend paths. Average profit was strongest on strong-downtrend paths in this board.
Also notable: Scalping Robot Pro led wins (31) with average +$82.48. The Gold Reaper had the best average (+$90.96). Its worst path fell 26.89% and closed at −$188.61.
Quantum iGold MT5 vs gold scalpers
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were sideways-tight / gradual-bull style paths.
Also notable: AurumEdge Scalper Pro led wins (27) with average +$78.60. Its worst path fell 26.50% and closed at −$257.29.
Quantum iGold MT5 vs gold trend peers
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: No first-place paths on this board, so path-type wins are not listed.
Also notable: Gold Vanguard EA led wins (21) with average +$84.23. Its worst path fell 29.74% and closed at −$297.32.
Quantum iGold MT5 vs gold scalper field
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were gradual-bear / gradual-bull style paths. Average profit was strongest on strong-uptrend paths in this board.
Also notable: Adaptive Gold Scalper led wins (24) with average +$101.42. Its worst path fell 34.87% and closed at −$334.12.
Quantum iGold MT5 vs gold grid / recovery stress
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were low-volatility-quiet paths. Average profit was strongest on news-shock paths in this board.
Also notable: Lizard led wins (22) with average +$72.33. Gold Vanguard EA had the best average (+$92.82). Its worst path fell 25.77% and closed at −$234.16.
Quantum iGold MT5 vs gold AI peers
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were news-shock paths. Average profit was strongest on strong-downtrend paths in this board.
Also notable: Aurum AI led wins (24) with average +$61.34. Its worst path fell 29.62% and closed at −$291.56.
Quantum iGold MT5 vs gold hybrid peers
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were gradual-bull paths.
Also notable: Sharkyra Gold led wins (20) with average +$56.12. Its worst path fell 36.39% and closed at −$326.67.
Quantum iGold MT5 gold @ 0.5% risk
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were sideways-tight / gradual-bear style paths.
Also notable: Byrdi led wins (17) with average +$17.45. TwisterPro Scalper had the best average (+$35.90). Its worst path fell 25.41% and closed at −$254.09.
Quantum iGold MT5 gold @ 2% risk
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were sideways-tight paths.
Also notable: Prisma led wins (29) with average +$71.25. Its worst path fell 33.73% and closed at −$277.30.
Quantum iGold MT5 gold @ $300 deposit
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: No first-place paths on this board, so path-type wins are not listed.
Also notable: GoldSpire led wins (18) with average +$12.83. GOLD Scalper PRO had the best average (+$32.19). On a $300.00 deposit, −$34.19 is about −11.4%. Its worst path fell 54.55% and closed at −$151.74 — its deepest in this set.
Quantum iGold MT5 gold @ $5000 deposit
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were strong-downtrend / high-volatility-chop style paths. Average profit was strongest on low-volatility-quiet paths in this board.
Also notable: Aureum Quant led wins (20) with average +$207.26. On a $5,000.00 deposit, −$53.37 is about −1.1%. Its worst path fell 25.53% and closed at −$1,271.04.
Quantum iGold MT5 mixed gold @ 180-day window
EAs in this test
What stood out in this test
Path types in this board: Among its first-place paths, most were strong-downtrend / strong-uptrend style paths.
Also notable: Gold Zilla AI led wins (40) with average +$94.04. Its worst path fell 27.81% and closed at −$276.13.
Full ranking for the main test
Full results for Quantum iGold MT5 vs mixed gold popular. Wins mean finished first on a path — not the same as “always made profit.”
| Rank | EA | Wins | Avg profit | Avg return | Avg DD | Worst DD | Washouts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
24 | $52.47 | 5.25% | 9.94% | 25.78% | 0 |
| 2 |
|
19 | $63.32 | 6.33% | 8.79% | 20.01% | 0 |
| 3 |
|
13 | $66.29 | 6.63% | 7.59% | 12.88% | 0 |
| 4 |
|
13 | $58.61 | 5.86% | 7.86% | 16.83% | 0 |
| 5 |
|
9 | $40.64 | 4.06% | 8.92% | 23.51% | 0 |
| 6 |
|
9 | $37.15 | 3.72% | 9.34% | 26.38% | 0 |
| 7 |
|
5 | -$14.16 | -1.42% | 10.00% | 24.37% | 0 |
| 8 |
|
4 | -$32.90 | -3.29% | 11.40% | 35.33% | 0 |
| 9 |
|
3 | -$15.79 | -1.58% | 11.20% | 33.77% | 0 |
| 10 |
|
1 | -$39.81 | -3.98% | 11.22% | 30.51% | 0 |
Related on Orion: gold EA store · risk disclosure · backtesting limits
So… is Quantum iGold MT5 worth trying?
Where it looked stronger or weaker
Fit by condition uses FX EA Tester peer groups, not a live product claim.
Better in these test mixes
- Scalper group — its best finish: #5 on wins (9/100, tied), −$36.40
- $5000 account — most paths in profit (50/100) and its lowest average drawdown (8.90%), though −$53.37 and last on wins
- MT5 mixed board — its mildest $1000 average (−$34.68), 42/100 in profit
- 0.5% risk — its shallowest worst path (25.41%)
Weaker in these test mixes
- 180-day window — weakest average (−$86.43), 19/100 in profit
- $300 account — last on wins (0/100), 19/100 in profit, worst path 54.55%
- 2% risk — −$64.22, last on wins
- Hybrid peer field — deepest $1000 worst path (36.39%), last on wins
- Trend peer field — 0 wins
Strong points
- Low list price ($125) next to many paid gold EAs
- #5 on wins against the scalper group (9/100, tied)
- $5000 account: 50/100 paths in profit and its calmest average drawdown (8.90%)
- No account washouts in these tests
- Clear product setup: MT5, XAUUSD, four timeframes, built-in stops
Weak points
- Negative average on all 14 boards
- Last on wins on 10 boards; lowest average on 11
- $300 account: 19/100 paths in profit and a 54.55% worst path
- 180-day window: −$86.43 with 19/100 in profit
- Lower risk (0.5%) still averaged −$39.28
Reasons it may fit you
- You want an honest check of a popular low-cost MT5 gold EA before you spend money
- You care about average profit, not only marketplace reviews
- You will demo before using real money
Reasons to be careful
- You need positive averages across many gold-EA tests
- You plan to run a small account near the $500 minimum
- You only trust live Myfxbook / broker results
Our take
In these 90-day gold tests it did not hold up next to other gold EAs. It averaged negative on all 14 boards, was last on wins on ten, had the lowest average on eleven, and lowering risk to 0.5% did not turn it positive. The $300 account was the hardest case, with a worst path near 55%.
Our take: Cautious — weaker results in these tests. The low price makes a demo easy, but the tests do not support live use without your own long demo check. Downloads stay on MetaTrader Market.
Every EA in a test uses the same FX EA Tester rules. We show results even when this EA is not first. These are research tests — not live trading. Read the risk disclosure.
Other strong gold EAs to consider
No EA won every test. If Quantum iGold MT5 is not the right fit — or you want a second option — start here.
When: You want the EA that led Quantum iGold’s mixed, MT4 and MT5 boards
Scalping Robot Pro has a full research page and led those three boards on wins, with the best average on MT4 (+$78.35).
When: You want a gold EA that led the trend board
Gold Vanguard has a full research page, led the trend board (+$84.23) and had the best average on grid stress (+$92.82).
When: You want an MT5 gold EA with strong averages at low risk
TwisterPro Scalper has a full research page and had the best average on the mixed popular (+$66.29) and 0.5% risk (+$35.90) boards here.
When: You want a stronger gold scalper
Adaptive Gold Scalper has a full research page and led the scalper field with a +$101.42 average.
What the run looked like
Screens from FX EA Tester while the tests ran — real test progress, not ad images.
Quantum iGold MT5 vs mixed gold popular
Quantum iGold MT5 vs gold scalpers
FAQ
Where do I download Quantum iGold MT5?
Use the Download button on this page for the official MetaTrader 5 product. Demo first before any live use.
Is Quantum iGold MT5 part of the Quantum Queen series?
No. Quantum iGold MT5 is by Yassine Mouhssine. Quantum Queen and Quantum Emperor are from a different developer. The names are similar, but they are separate products.
How much does Quantum iGold MT5 cost?
It was $125 to buy on 30 Sep 2026, with no rent option shown. Check the download page for the current price.
What does it need to run?
MetaTrader 5, an XAUUSD chart on M5, M15, H1 or D1, at least $500 in the account, and a supported account type (Raw, ECN, Cent, Micro, Standard or Premium). A VPS helps if you leave it running 24/5.
Can I change the stop loss and take profit?
No. The stop loss and take profit are built into the strategy and cannot be overridden by external inputs. Your main risk controls are lot size and account balance.
How did it do in the gold tests?
Weakly. It averaged negative on all 14 boards over 90 days, from −$34.68 (MT5 mix) to −$86.43 (180-day) on $1000. It never finished first, and it was last on wins on 10 boards.
Did lower risk help?
Not much. At 0.5% risk it averaged −$39.28, close to its 1% boards. At 2% risk the average fell to −$64.22.
How deep was the drawdown?
Average max drawdown was about 8.9–16.9%. Worst paths reached about 25–36% on $1000 boards, 54.55% on the $300 account and 25.53% on $5000.
Is Quantum iGold MT5 worth $125?
The price is low and the setup is simple, but these tests did not show it keeping up with other gold EAs — no plus average on any board. If you still want to try it, demo first with a small lot and compare it with the EAs below.
Which gold EAs looked better in these tests?
Scalping Robot Pro led the mixed, MT4 and MT5 boards. Gold Vanguard EA led the trend board, TwisterPro Scalper had the best average on the mixed popular and 0.5% risk boards, and Adaptive Gold Scalper MT5 led the scalper field. All have full research pages.
Did it face 100 gold EAs at once?
No. 14 gold boards, 71 unique other EAs, 10 per board.
Are these live trading results?
No. These are FX EA Tester gold boards, not live trading results. Marketplace reviews and live signals are not checked here.
What to do next
1) Note the main finding: no plus average on any of the 14 boards, and last on wins on 10.
2) Compare Scalping Robot Pro, Gold Vanguard EA or TwisterPro Scalper below if you want stronger results in these tests.
3) ZIP downloads are optional rank files.
4) If you still want to try it, demo first at 0.01 lots on more than the $500 minimum.
More gold EAs with experiments
Research test results are not live trading performance. Orion publishes honest test-based reviews so you can check setup, profit, and risk before you try an EA — not financial advice. Official downloads stay on MetaTrader Market. Read the risk disclosure.